Hmmm
Pros:
Spread the features across platforms
Reduce broadcast failure/domain
Cons:
More subnets and all that entails
Maybe more licensing?
Limits your deployment of simple L2 switches
Then you wouldn't need a spendy MX to do it all in one box.
-Mike Gonnason
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 7:00 AM J
performer, with plenty of
support for modern data center tech. I have deployed a bunch of QFX5120 in
a EVPN config but also have some in VC or standalone, however none doing
802.1x.
-Mike Gonnason
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 12:12 PM Jason Healy via juniper-nsp <
juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> w
For my EX4600s i used:
https://www.racksolutions.com/2post-center-mount-brackets.html
Which I found to be very sturdy and good for multiple RUs of equipment.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 11:05 AM Colton Conor wrote:
> Brian, are you talking about this kit:
>
Have you considered EX4600?
It is like a QFX5100 but with less feature support. I have 2x in an MC-LAG
which has been great, but it supports Virtual Chassis too.
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 7:44 AM Giovanni Bellac via juniper-nsp <
juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> we have migrated
Be aware on the QFX5110 that L3 VXLAN is limited, You cannot route vxlan to
vlan:
https://prsearch.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=prcontent=PR1318178
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 3:51 PM Brant Ian Stevens <
bra...@argentiumsolutions.com> wrote:
> And now there's the announcement of the QFX5120
I enjoyed last year, lots of good talks and good people to talk with; both
other customers and juniper.
-Mike Gonnason
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 6:28 AM Jeffrey Fry <j...@fryguy.net> wrote:
> Aaron -
>
> I attended Nxtwork 2016 last year and really enjoyed it. It is a small
It really should just work. DHCP across layer 2 is a pretty common use case.
What code are you running?
-Mike Gonnason
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 10:34 AM Scott Granados <sc...@granados-llc.net>
wrote:
> Do you have any config snippets? Sounds pretty straight forward, maybe
> s
routing
root@switch# set ethernet-switching-options nonstop-bridging
Enable Nonstop active bridging
root@switch# set chassis redundancy graceful-switchover
Enable GRES
-Mike Gonnason
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Mario Andres Rueda Jaimes
maeve2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All
We
Hi Paul,
I am just setting up a pair of EX4300 in a VC on 13.2X51-D30.4. Let me
attempt the config and see what happens.
Mike Gonnason
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Paul S. cont...@winterei.se wrote:
Nobody ran into this one?
Weird.
On 3/16/2015 午後 10:40, Paul S. wrote:
Hi
protocols]
+ sflow {
+ interfaces ge-1/0/30.10;
+ interfaces ge-1/0/30.20;
+ }
coresw1# commit check
[edit protocols sflow]
'interfaces ge-1/0/30.10'
sFlow can only be run on .0 interfaces
error: configuration check-out failed
Mike Gonnason
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:56 AM
I also cannot do sflow on non zero irb interfaces:
coresw1# commit check
[edit protocols sflow]
'interfaces irb.12'
sFlow can only be run on .0 interfaces
error: configuration check-out failed
Mike Gonnason
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Mike Gonnason gonna...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul
people
should be able to provide you with a full list of required ACLs for the
functionality you are aiming for.
-Mike Gonnason
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Bill Blackford bblackf...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not finding anything cases in the archives on this.
Has anyone deployed Microsoft Lync 2010
What is your latency? What window size are you using and how many TCP
sessions?
-Mike Gonnason
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Johan Borch johan.bo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
I'm doing some performance troubleshooting between two linux systems, the
servers are located in each end of an L3VPN
.
You can try modifying the NC class and alter how the scheduling is
performed. in section 21 you can see 5% is specified for the NC scheduler.
http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos13.2/topics/example/cos-ex-series-configuring.html
-Mike Gonnason
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Josh
I have 4 VC stacks of 2x EX4200 in X ring, with no issues. I am running
11.4R1, 11.4R2, 11.4R5, (they have deployed overtime, and have not had a
reason to schedule downtime yet).
Some are auto-config, others are pre-provisioned.
-Mike Gonnason
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Skeeve Stevens
What version are you running?
Have you examined:
http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/release-independent/junos/topics/concept/ex-series-software-features-overview.html
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Robert Hass robh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Is egress policing or shaping supported on
Someone on reddit was reporting similar issues:
http://www.reddit.com/r/networking/comments/2eoyna/srx110_replacement_options/
- Mike Gonnason
On Aug 27, 2014 6:23 PM, Skeeve Stevens
skeeve+juniper...@eintellegonetworks.com wrote:
Hi all,
I have a customer with some SRX110's with DSL tails
Instead of disabling the interface, can you just alter routing to avoid
that path, but RPM could still test since that interface would still be up?
-Mike Gonnason
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Tyler Christiansen ty...@adap.tv wrote:
Good point. I glossed over that a bit.
In that case
for the router. Definitely not ideal...
-Mike Gonnason
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Mike Devlin mikecdev...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Guys,
Anyone know of a tested commit script that will update NAT config based on
a DHCP interface changing IP addresses?
The scenario is this. I have
I have not had any issues enabling inline-jflow on my SRX100 deployments.
running code from 11.4R6.6 to 12.1x44-D35.5,
-Mike Gonnason
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Scott Granados sc...@granados-llc.net
wrote:
Hi, the title just about sums it up but the details are this. I have
several
It seems like you can do it on Data Center SRX devices, but not branch.
http://forums.juniper.net/t5/SRX-Services-Gateway/RETH-interfaces-on-branch-SRX-clusters-and-jFlow/td-p/253211
I cannot find a workaround for this limitation, still seems to be present
in 12.1x46
/topics/usage-guidelines/interfaces-configuring-inner-and-outer-tpids-and-vlan-ids.html
-Mike Gonnason
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Kevin Wormington kw...@sofnet.com wrote:
Hi,
Would anyone care to share a config example that would allow outer TPID
translation between two different ports
Looking at:
http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=contentid=KB16466
It looks like Enhanced allows for some caching to occur?
Oh I found this:
http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos12.1x46/topics/concept/utm-web-filtering-overview.html
Maybe that will be helpful?
-Mike Gonnason
23 matches
Mail list logo
