doesnt matter,the hashing is the same if you reverse the IPs. Use
your phase 1 addresses
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Phil Fagan philfa...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like the keywords here are anchoring VPN to an SPU. I think this
involves the way RG mappings occur on SPU(s). Anyone with info
@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
That's what I'm thinking.
On Dec 19, 2013 9:29 AM, John Neiberger jneiber...@gmail.com wrote:
When I telnet from a Juniper router to a device on one TCP port I get
connection refused, but if I try some other ports I get operation
not permitted. What is the difference between these messages? Is
Are you trying to transit 1500 or terminate 1500? You should be able to
pass and fragment. But maybe the mgmt plane won't frag if your trying the
interface itself.
hi, all:
i have a genetic question regarding ip fragmentation. i have two routers;
one is cisco and another is juniper. they
Curious to know what folks think about potential security issues with split
tunnel
On Dec 3, 2013 6:54 PM, Herro91 herr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am doing some research regarding whether government agencies generally
are for or against enabling split tunnels for their teleworkers?
Pro=junos
Con=nonjunos
:-)
On Oct 8, 2013 10:05 AM, R S dim0...@hotmail.com wrote:
Is anybody
able to tell me which are the very technical pro and cons between Juniper
VC
solution (vccp) against Cisco stack (Stackwise?) and Huwaei stack
(iStack?) solutions ?
Tks
://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Link:
http://www.juniper.net/us/en/community/junos/training-certification/day-one/networking-technologies-series/scaling-beyond-single-srx-dc/
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Phil Fagan philfa...@gmail.com wrote:
Correct; in a cluster your limited to the session count capability of a
single
@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
.
** **
-andy
** **
*From:* Phil Fagan [mailto:philfa...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Friday, October 04, 2013 2:52 PM
*To:* Andy Litzinger
*Cc:* juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
*Subject:* Re: [j-nsp] SRX fab links through EX VC- seeing enumerating
MAC addresses
** **
Very little is said other than
@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/**mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsphttps://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo
mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
What issues are you seeing with OSPF? Been seeing healthy BGP configs with
the st's if that's an option for you.
On Oct 1, 2013 7:45 PM, Morgan McLean wrx...@gmail.com wrote:
Am I able to configure family iso over an ST interface? Not looking like
its an option on a 210 I'm messing with.
Got it; well let me know if you find either because its a very interesting
scenario! Always a fan of the clever solutions :-)
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Rob Foehl r...@loonybin.net wrote:
On Fri, 27 Sep 2013, Phil Fagan wrote:
could you use BGP multi-hop and simply peer directly
could you use BGP multi-hop and simply peer directly to the MX bypassing
the need to redist routes in though your OSPF core?
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Rob Foehl r...@loonybin.net wrote:
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013, Phil Fagan wrote:
Is your aggregate policy already on the MX and is its
standard t1.606.
any pointers/links would be appreciated.
thanks!
q.
--
quinn snyder
snyd...@gmail.com
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970
://puck.nether.net/**mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsphttps://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
?
q.
-= sent via ipad. please excuse brevity, spelling, and grammar =-
On Sep 26, 2013, at 13:18, Phil Fagan philfa...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like only 102 and 107; not 106.
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:50 PM, quinn snyder snyd...@gmail.com wrote:
all --
just a quick reachout. trying to dig
@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Any resolve?
On Aug 6, 2013 10:34 AM, Laurent CARON lca...@unix-scripts.info wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to establish a VPN tunnel between a SRX220 and an OpenSwan box.
SRX is:
Model: srx220h
JUNOS Software Release [12.1X44-D20.3]
OpenSwan: 2.6.37
Both are currently hooked on a test LAN.
__**_
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/**mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsphttps://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
-
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf
Of Phil Fagan
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 10:12 AM
To: Julien Goodwin
Cc: juniper-nsp
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] LN2600: an 8SFP Branch SRX
Where do these rugged devices usually get put? Just outdoors?
On Fri, Aug 2
Anyone out there running IKEv2 with PKI on SRX?
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
27 matches
Mail list logo
