What's your version of code? Z-traffic is bad before 11.4+ at least. Don't expect big MTU to go over the Fabric or heavy amounts of bandwidth usage even if its 10G.
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:38 AM, OBrien, Will <obri...@missouri.edu> wrote: > The fabric carries traffic between the nodes, so it's my immediate suspect > on the traffic loss. > > Are your connections configured as standard Reth interfaces? Are you using > some form of igp? > In active/active mode, I've seen some traffic loss, but most of it was due > to ospf taking time to select the new pathway. > > > > > On Sep 3, 2013, at 9:54 AM, R S wrote: > > we have a remote cluster, hence no direct connection is provided but a > switched connection (through L2 infrstructure - a vlan basically) > yes dual REs > why do you suppose a problem on fabric links ? > > > > > > From: obri...@missouri.edu<mailto:obri...@missouri.edu> > > To: dim0...@hotmail.com<mailto:dim0...@hotmail.com> > > CC: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net<mailto:juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> > > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX5k problem > > Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 14:19:35 +0000 > > > > Failover works fine on my 5800 cluster. I use direct connections for > fabric and control. > > It sounds like you're losing traffic in Zmode. I'd start by taking a > serious look at your fabric links. > > Do you have dual REs in each chassis for the double control links? > > > > > > On Sep 3, 2013, at 7:34 AM, R S wrote: > > > > > We are having a geographic SRX5800 chassis cluster with two > redundancy-groups (RG0 and RG1). > > > > > > We are having many issues while performing the failover of the RG1, > with and without preemption. The issue is that when the RG1 becomes active > on the node1, real traffic is being lost. Also with preemption, when the > node0 becomes again the active for the RG1, lot of traffic is lost. > > > > > > There are dual Ctrl and Fabric link both through a Layer2 > infrastructure, one couple through MX960 and one couple through EX8200. > > > > > > Any similar nightmare ? > > > > > > Tks > > > _______________________________________________ > > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net<mailto: > juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> > > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > -- Phil Fagan Denver, CO 970-480-7618 _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp