Re: [j-nsp] EX4550 L2Circuit/VPN to MX80/lt

2014-11-19 Thread Philip Palanchi
the lack of LSR functionality in the EX won't work for us. I'm curious to know what MPLS features or functionalities are lacking on the EX4550 in comparison to MX series. Thanks, Phil - Original Message - From: juniper-nsp-requ...@puck.nether.net To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent:

[j-nsp] DNS signed zone and IP Fragments

2012-05-01 Thread Philip Palanchi
I'm looking for a firewall packet filter to deal with IP Fragments as described in the link below. https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/2010-February/078917.html We run a pair of MX240's with 10.1R3.7 at the edge. Running stateless firewall filters inbound on Internet handoffs allowing

Re: [j-nsp] PIM SM RP issue

2010-12-16 Thread Philip Palanchi
- Original Message - From: Nilesh Khambal nkham...@juniper.net To: Philip Palanchi palan...@rutgers.edu, juniper-nsp juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 4:34:15 PM Subject: Re: [j-nsp] PIM SM RP issue On M10is acting as RP, do you a route similar to this in the kernel

[j-nsp] PIM SM RP issue

2010-12-15 Thread Philip Palanchi
We're seeing what seems to be an interoperability problem when we configure PIM Sparse-mode Rendezvous Point on either m10i or mx240 and the PIM source registration messages are coming from cisco routers where the cfeb's, fpc's and dpc's go to 100% cpu utilization all the time. The box stops

Re: [j-nsp] PIM SM RP issue

2010-12-15 Thread Philip Palanchi
Sure thing. I'll pull this info tomorrow. The m10i has 9.6R4.4 with ASII PIC. It's a one-armed router and it's only mission is to be the PIM-SM RP. Thanks, Phil - Original Message - From: Smith W. Stacy st...@acm.org To: Philip Palanchi palan...@rutgers.edu Cc: juniper-nsp juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] MX240 running 10.1R1.8

2010-07-16 Thread Philip Palanchi
Two weeks ago we fired up two new mx240's running 10.1R1.8 and shortly after I noticed a large (and growing!) log file: file list /var/log/pfed_event_trace.log Well it seems to be a bug in EX series with backup RE. However it must be more widespread because we have MX with no backup RE!

[j-nsp] LLDP between cisco and juniper

2010-03-25 Thread Philip Palanchi
I have enabled LLDP between several mx240's JUNOS 9.6R1.13 with DPCE-R-20GE-2XGE and several cisco 6506's. LLDP works fine in both directions for anything connected by a 10G interface. None of the mx240's sees the cisco LLDP neighbor connected by 1GE interface. However, the cisco's see the