or offers.
Shane Ronan
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
www.ronan-online.com/forsale.html
On Mar 21, 2010, at 7:10 PM, Shane Ronan wrote:
Hello everyone,
This might be slightly off topic, but I am shutting down a large
network, and selling off the assets.
Information is @ www.ronan-online/forsale.html
I will be adding items to the list
Hello list,
I have exhausted all of my capabilities to figure out the answer to
this question, so I am hoping you can help.
I have two connections to the same network, which both provide me
routes via RIP for Multicast sources.
Is there a way for me to prefer the routes I receive via one
PM, Shane Ronan sro...@fattoc.com
wrote:
Hello list,
I have exhausted all of my capabilities to figure out the answer to
this question, so I am hoping you can help.
I have two connections to the same network, which both provide me
routes via RIP for Multicast sources.
Is there a way
Should have read does not cause sorry
On Mar 11, 2010, at 9:08 PM, Shane Ronan wrote:
I tried this, but it seems to set the metric for the route, and does
cause the router to choose one interface over the other.
Shane
On Mar 11, 2010, at 7:16 PM, Hoogen wrote:
This should work..
set
I did, and it seems to set the metric on the route, regardless of
interface.
On Mar 11, 2010, at 9:28 PM, Stefan Fouant wrote:
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Shane Ronan
Sent: Thursday, March 11
On Mar 8, 2010, at 1:54 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
I wonder if that is because the IS-IS Hello PDUs are being sent
as Ethernet Multicast frames
This had been my suspicion as well. Is it possible to disable igmp-
snooping on the EX2500's?
-Shane
I have two IP addresses on an Interface, which is connected to an
upstream network which has a Multicast source on it. I am running PIM,
but the PIM requests are being sent from the wrong IP, is there a way
to specify which of the two IP's should be used for the PIM requests?
Thanks,
Shane
Happy Thanksgiving
eom
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
, I think it is SW3 which SW1 goes all the
round.
mtc
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Shane Ronan
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 9:27 PM
To: juniper-nsp
Subject: [j-nsp] Strange Latency on EX
which SW1 goes all the
round.
mtc
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Shane Ronan
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 9:27 PM
To: juniper-nsp
Subject: [j-nsp] Strange Latency on EX-4248t virtual
Hoping someone here can help me with the issue I describe below. I know 4u
seems like a VERY small amount of latency, but it's an issue for our system.
I have a set of five ex-4248t switches, connected via virtual chassis such that
no two switches are more then two hops apart, as show below.
1
Along these lines, but slightly off topic, what kind of light meters
do you guys use?
Shane
On Sep 25, 2009, at 10:50 AM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:15:16AM -0400, Stefan Fouant wrote:
It's expensive to put dB meters on every optical interface, and
since
42 interfaces? How do you figure? With a virtual chassis
configuration, you can have many more then 42 interfaces. I have one
configuration where I have 192 ports in one configuration.
On Jul 3, 2009, at 4:12 PM, Dan Farrell wrote:
I'm not sure that this is always a good idea, anyway.
I would agree with this, no reason to bother with HSRP, since you
already have the redundancy of two sessions.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Ball
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 4:12 PM
To: Derick Winkworth
Cc: Campbell, Alex;
For us uninitiated, what is contained in this API?
On Jul 5, 2008, at 9:05 AM, Stacy W. Smith wrote:
On Jul 4, 2008, at 9:01 AM, Mike Porter wrote:
Hi,
What is the lastest release of the JUNOS Perl API?
junoscript-perl-6.4R1.6-domestic.tar.gz?
Thanks,
Mike
I believe there's a
Sounds like with your configuration you are transiting traffic
between your two peer AS's.
Can you run 'show route advertising-protocol neighbor' for each of
your two peer's when you have both up and running?
It may be that the 2meg link is saturated and the keepalive messages
are not
Or maybe they wouldn't be upset if you were providing a reliable link
between two previously un-peered AS's.
On Jul 5, 2008, at 12:11 PM, Scott Morris wrote:
HA! You are correct that they SHOULDN'T accept that from you,
but Best
ideas are not always implemented. :) Just make sure
Just because I am curious, neither of the providers or JTAC thought of
the solutions I did?
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 5, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Lee Hetherington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi All,
I have a very odd problem with a J Series router and wonder if
anyone can help, as neither our
OpenNMS does it all for me!
On Jun 1, 2008, at 7:17 AM, alaerte vidali [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
What are you using to monitor SNMP variables in Juniper and logging
applications?
tks,
Alaerte
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
Curious why you think this wouldn't meet electrical code?
On Feb 9, 2008, at 3:50 PM, Michael Lambert wrote:
Does it work? Yes (at least for M20).
Is it supported? No.
Does it meet electrical code? Probably not.
Michael
On 9 Feb 2008, at 16:07, Jeff Meyers wrote:
Hi list,
is it
I have used Transition Networks SFPs in the past in my Junipers,
specifically TN-GLC-LH-SM, and they work very well.
On Jan 10, 2008, at 1:46 PM, Eric Van Tol wrote:
Hi all,
Is anyone using Transition Networks' SFPs in their Junipers? If so,
have you had any problems with them? I'm
Check out RANCID, it's an opensource config differ.
http://www.shrubbery.net/rancid/
On Jan 3, 2008, at 3:34 AM, Diogo Montagner wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking for the best sollution for a JUNOS configuration backup
methods.
The best solution for my case would be the system archival with a
23 matches
Mail list logo
