Experts,
what is the general opinion from ISP out there about using RPF on external
peering interfaces?
And which variant:
-loose active-path
-loose feasible-path
-strict active-path
-strict feasible-path
?
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
Experts,
are you aware of 'best common practice' for RE protection in an SP environment?
Thanks,
TheDarkOne
Я в Моем Мире - http://my.mail.ru/list/thedarkone/
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Experts,
the output of this command presents a huge amount of information of which a big
share is quite cryptic. Do you know if there is a reference table that explains
field by field the output of this command. Probably the most complex is 'show
route protocol bgp extensive'
Thanks,
bit.
Я в
Experts, is the following true?
If ISIS is configured across an ae interface, due to the hashing algorithm, all
hello frames will use the same member link; due to the convergence time for
LACP being higher than ISIS holdtime of the adjacency, if that link fails, ISIS
will flap before
That is exactly the point :-)
I have created an area 0 adjacency and the default is sent to the
totally-stubby-area
Thank you very much for help.
-Original Message-
From: Harry Reynolds ha...@juniper.net
To: The Dark One thedark...@list.ru, Juniper Puckjuniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Date
Experts,
according to JNCIP_studyguide pag 179:
Juniper Networks routers do not automatically generate a default route when
operating as an ABR attached to a stub or not-so-stubby area. With JUNOS
software, you must configure a default metric before a default route will be
advertised!
But router
Experts,
I can find the example at this URL:
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos95/mx-solutions-guide/frameset.html
using encapsulation flexible-ethernet-services
but I can not find any explanation for what 'flexible-ethernet-services' really
is and does
Any pointer?
.
Thanks,
TheDarkOne
-Original Message-
From: Arda Balkanay ardabalka...@gmail.com
To: The Dark One thedark...@list.ru, Juniper Puck
juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:50:12 +0200
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] EoMPLS and routing
Hi,
R1 and R3 can form a multihop bgp session if you
R2 and R3 are the endpoints of an EoMPLS circuit
R1 is physically connected to the EoMPLS endpoint on R2
R1 -- R2 ==EoMPLS== R3
Is it possible for R1 to talk IP with R3, for instance establish a BGP session?
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
how to do it..
Cheers,
The Dark One
l...@olive-02# set protocols pim interface ge-7/2/0.0
^
fpc value outside range 0..5 for '7/2/0.0' in 'ge-7/2/0.0' at 'ge-7/2/0.0'
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper
10 matches
Mail list logo