Re: [j-nsp] force-64bit

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Saku Ytti wrote: > On 1 June 2016 at 20:32, Phil Rosenthal wrote: > > I suspect that there is not that high of a risk of bugs due to this > change, in all likelihood, the only changes required for this was a > different compiler

Re: [j-nsp] force-64bit

64bit RPD is newer, and by nature will have more bugs - so don't run this unless you need it. Check this with "show task memory" - this will show what you have used of the RPD accessible memory. As Phil notes, you'd need significant RIB scale (which does exist in larger networks) to require

Re: [j-nsp] Gracefully delete MPLS RSVP LSP

Increase the route preference on the LSP; [edit protocols mpls label-switched-path R1-R2-a] +preference 200; On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Masood Ahmad Shah wrote: > Raising LSP metric sounds good to me > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:00 PM, tim tiriche