Re: [j-nsp] IPv6 subnetting

Hi, Yes, you cannot assign 10::14/126 which 4 I believe is network ID for /126 (/30 in ipv4), before 10::14/126 there should 10::/126. If you still want you this /126, please set to 10::15/126 should be fine. rgs a. rahman isnaini rangkayo sutan. snort bsd wrote: > Hi all: > >>From RFC4291,

Re: [j-nsp] ethernet aggregation between M5 and HP Procurve 4000M

I've done successfully the trunking on 2 fastethernet M5 ports aggregated with outgoing traffic 95% load balanced, the switch is catalyst 2924XL. Thanks to Ariff. rgs a. rahman isnaini rangkayo sutan Tim Durack wrote: > On Jan 31, 2008 9:59 AM, Nicolaj Kamensek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> A

[j-nsp] Juniper - Cisco Catalyst Fast Ether Channel Load Balancing

Hi, Any suggestion will be very appreciated. Here's the scheme : Ports aggregation with trunking was success between Juniper - Cisco Catalyst, but i'm having problem with the load that is not balanced on each port. It might be the config still missing one line somewhere :) interfaces { fe-