Re: [j-nsp] PIM Join Load Balancing

atic" option that can be included with the knob. From: Aaron Gould Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 10:21 PM To: 'craig washington' ; 'Juniper List' Subject: RE: [j-nsp] PIM Join Load Balancing This ? [edit protocols pim ] user@host#

[j-nsp] PIM Join Load Balancing

Has anyone tried running or are running PIM Join load balancing. Most of the documentation I have read doesn't suggest it works for plain multicast? Thanks ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listin

Re: [j-nsp] LSP's with IPV6 on Juniper

r LDP. > Le 29 août 2018 à 15:10, craig washington a > écrit : > > When I set this up in the lab (logical systems) and followed the Juniper > documentation for setting up 6PE the IPV6 prefixes didn't resolve to LSP's. > The documentation says to add labeled unicas

Re: [j-nsp] LSP's with IPV6 on Juniper

No, there isn't a particular business problem or requirement. When I set this up in the lab (logical systems) and followed the Juniper documentation for setting up 6PE the IPV6 prefixes didn't resolve to LSP's. The documentation says to add labeled unicast with explicit null and tunneling. I ha

Re: [j-nsp] LSP's with IPV6 on Juniper

next-hops are IPv4, but again, it doesn't matter, only the results matter: it works :) You don't explicitly "change" the next-hop of IPv6 using policies, you just use nexthopself and that's it. > Le 27 août 2018 à 18:39, craig washington a > écrit : > > Hel

[j-nsp] LSP's with IPV6 on Juniper

Hello all. Wondering if anyone is using MPLS with IPV6? I have read on 6PE and the vpn counterpart but these all seem to take into account that the CORE isn't running IPV6? My question is how can we get the ACTUAL IPV6 loopback addresses into inet6.3 table? Would I need to do a rib import for

Re: [j-nsp] MX480

Yea I am able to download it now but don't see any release notes yet.. From: juniper-nsp on behalf of Sebastian Wiesinger Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 2:33 PM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX480 * Vincent Bernat [2018-06-17 12:17]: > ❦

Re: [j-nsp] MX480

It's not released yet as far as I know. I know it was supposed to be at least per our SE at Juniper. Hopefully will have some sort of update this week unless anyone else knows something. From: juniper-nsp on behalf of Vincent Bernat Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2

Re: [j-nsp] MX480

Same here with the juniper recommendation, they have recommend the Golden release 16.1R7 for us also Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 16, 2018, at 2:59 PM, Saku Ytti wrote: > > Hey, > >> Wait for a golden release, ask JTAC about the next golden release coming >> out. Maybe 17.3R2 or R3. They wi

Re: [j-nsp] Logical Systems with VPLS using only lt interfaces

ed as expected. Thanks again Aaron for taking time to take a look at it and hopefully this will help someone down the road. From: Aaron Gould Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 8:37 PM To: 'craig washington'; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE:

[j-nsp] Logical Systems with VPLS using only lt interfaces

All, I am setting up some logical systems on an MX480. The question I have is, has anyone run across an issue when trying to get sites to communicate using VPLS b/c of duplicate mac-address? Pings of course don't work but the control plane looks good but I am concerned about the mac. You can

Re: [j-nsp] chassis redundancy failover on-disk-failure information

MX Series,T Series,PTX Series. When a hard disk error occurs, a Routing Engine might enter a state in which it responds to local pings and interfaces remain up, but no other processes are responding. From: juniper-nsp on behalf of craig washington Sent: We

Re: [j-nsp] EX4550 L3VPN

I personally have never heard of it. Sounds very PRish to me, what code are you running and have you checked the Problem Report Search From: juniper-nsp on behalf of Aaron Gould Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 11:48 AM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [

[j-nsp] chassis redundancy failover on-disk-failure information

Hello all, I was wondering the benefit of this command and I guess I need a couple of questions answered by the brains out there. 1. If a hard-disk fails on a Juniper router (Dual RE) does the RE automatically fail-over or will it continue to function as master 2. If it doesn't automat

[j-nsp] Upgrading from RE-S-2000-4096-S/SCB-MX960-S to RE-S-1800X4-32G-S/SCBE2-MX-S

Hello smart people. We are in the process of upgrading from the aforementioned in the title. My question is does anyone have a procedure they have used in the past for doing this or any type of gotchas. We are also replacing the old DPC's for MPC's. I know the port numbers will change and tha

[j-nsp] BGP question (Default action if no protocol specified)

All, I was working a lab and noticed that if I didn't specify a protocol on an IBGP redistribution it basically sends everything you have? Direct, local, Agg or whatever. I am assuming this is working as designed b/c once I specified a protocol all of the routes disappeared. For example I had

[j-nsp] Standard practice for customer eBGP peering traffic engineer

Hello, wondering best practice for customer eBGP traffic engineering. We currently use local preference and let the customer send us a community to adjust but I had a call with a customer today and they mentioned a provider letting them send a community to have the providers AS prepended on th

Re: [j-nsp] Routing Engine upgrade

Thanks again for the feedback. So only NSR? What about GRES? From: Sachin Rai Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 2:51 AM To: craig washington; Elijah Zhuravlev Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Routing Engine upgrade Craig, I do not see any

Re: [j-nsp] Routing Engine upgrade

096-S CB 0 REV 23 750-031391 ABCY2536 SCBE-MX-S CB 1 REV 23 750-031391 ABCX9327 SCBE-MX-S From: Elijah Zhuravlev Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 9:20 AM To: Sachin Rai Cc: craig washington; juniper-nsp@puck.

[j-nsp] Routing Engine upgrade

Hello all, Kind of a general question but just wanted to double check any gotchas. We are upgrading some of our routers from RE-S-2000 to RE-S-1800x4. This should just be putting the new on in the backup, letting it sync and upgrade software as needed and then doing switch over, then performi

Re: [j-nsp] deactivate routing-options forwarding-table

Awesome. Thanks again. I went ahead and ran the below and it removed the deactivate command and no impact 😊 "delete routing-options forwarding-table export exp-to-fwd" show | compare - inactive: forwarding-table { - export exp-to-fwd; - } From: ju

[j-nsp] deactivate routing-options forwarding-table

Hello all, I am going through some configurations on some of our routers and noticed one router has the below command on it: "deactivate routing-options forwarding-table" Trying to understand what this command is actually doing as the forwarding table has routes and the router is working as e

[j-nsp] REGEX

Hello all, hope this is the right place for this. I am not the best with Regex and was looking for an expression in a Juniper that will match on only so many numbers. Meaning, I am looking at the mpls lsp statistics "show mpls lsp transit statistics" and I only want to see the LSP's that have l