Re: [j-nsp] IPV6 over PPP with radius

ed by > PPP but IPV6CP negotiates each node's Interface Identifier. Windows > Vista's PPP dialer supports v6, as well as the PPP dialer shipped with > Linux. > > Junaid > > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:44 PM, fighter worker > wrote: >> Dear all >>

Re: [j-nsp] RE : Junos Hidden routes

be in your FIB. then You can advertise > these routes to other peers. > > david > > De: ROY David DTF/DERX > Date: mer. 25/02/2009 16:33 > À: 'Stefan Fouant'; fighter worker > Cc: juniper-...@puck.nether.netyou need to import your

Re: [j-nsp] route into inactive state

well Stefan actually my case is little difference , iam taking here about full internet routing table i recieve from BGP peer and i dont want to put these routes into routing table as i use a static default route with differenet next hop to be able to control my upload but at the same time i have s

Re: [j-nsp] route into inactive state

i tried that but that route iam no longer able to send it to other bgp peers,, i need that route to be inactive in my routing table but still can advertise it to other bgp peers On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Stefan Fouant wrote: > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:53 AM, fighter worker wrote: >

Re: [j-nsp] route into inactive state

n Wed, 25 Feb 2009, fighter worker wrote: > >>> Dear all >>> is there a way to force certain route recieved from BGP to be into >>> inactive state even there is no other alternative route,through cisco >>> i used to put that route with admin distance 255 but wit

[j-nsp] route into inactive state

Dear all is there a way to force certain route recieved from BGP to be into inactive state even there is no other alternative route,through cisco i used to put that route with admin distance 255 but with juniper setting prefrence with 255 has no effect on that route cause there is no alternative ro

[j-nsp] Junos Hidden routes

Dear all i have question regarding Junos hidden routes which for example recieved over BG but filtered , is there a way to send these hidden routes through BGP to other peers , as i want to send certain routes without putting them into routing table Thanks in advance __

[j-nsp] IPV6 over PPP with radius

Dear all iam trying to implement IPV6 over PPPOE and i need to know if there is any modification to the PPPOE protocol as i know PPPOE is responsible only for simulating p2p over ethernet and to provide authentication model over ethernet and as far i know that PPP was modified to support IPv6 en