[j-nsp] SRX CoS Bandwidth

Hi, Can anybody explain the QoS operation of a SRX when a higher priority queue is in negative credit and a lower priority queue is in positive credit yet has traffic to transmit? The documentation suggests: "Transmission Scheduling The packets in a queue are transmitted based on their transmis

Re: [j-nsp] SRX for MPLS

Interesting/ disappointing to read that the top end SRXs don't support MPLS as it is clearly the intention to deploy MPLS to the edge with the smaller SRXs. So what is Juniper's solution for concentration points in the network e.g. head offices etc? Do the large SRXs have no support for "Family

Re: [j-nsp] Load balacing issue - M7i

It may depend on the environment you are trying to perform load sharing in, but we were informed by J-TAC that the M7i CFEB could not perform MPLS loadsharing across 2 equal cost paths - I'd love to be proved wrong ;-) An Enhanced CFEB would be required :( May be worth checking with J-TAC for your

Re: [j-nsp] Path MTU Discovery - MPLS VPN

RE: vrf-mtu-check; Thanks, yes J-series its applied automatically, the M-series I'd already applied it manually. Also tried enabling ICMP-tunneling, but still no luck :( Any ideas how to debug? Thanks, Tim. -- Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 20:46:01 +0500 (PKT) From: mas...@ne

Re: [j-nsp] Path MTU Discovery - MPLS VPN

Thanks Masood, I have an FE associated with the VRF on the CE/PE router with a /26 assigned and so I assume I meet that requirement? Should path MTU check work within the MPLS cloud ie. Say a link from the P to PE has a reduced MTU? IS there any general info out there that would help? I had a look

[j-nsp] Path MTU Discovery - MPLS VPN

Hi, I've been trying to get Path MTU Discovery working for M/J-series, appreciate that the M-series requires vrf-mtu-check setting. Having done this I've tried testing it by launching Pings (DF set) with a larger MTU than the link, but I'm getting no response at all - expecting ICMP response. Ha

[j-nsp] MPLS/VPN PE RPM Probes

Hi, Has any body experience of setting up RPM probes between MPLS/VPN PEs whilst using AS PIC for time stamping and CoS? I've tried to put the SP interface into the VPN without success, hence the return route is unknown to the far end. Using M-series on 8.1 code, it doesn't look like I can change

[j-nsp] Police Averaging Interval

Hi, Just wondering in any body knows what the time interval is, over which the policer statement calculates the Bandwidth, similarly the period for the burst size? Been digging around the documents and there are a couple of methods which describe how to set burst size... Any decent references?

Re: [j-nsp] Inter-AS VPN

Thanks Harry, indeed it is. Cheers, Tim. -Original Message- From: Harry Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 June 2008 16:55 To: Hunt,TJ,Tim,DGE62 R; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [j-nsp] Inter-AS VPN Yes, I believe only supported for multihop ebgp session, however:

[j-nsp] Inter-AS VPN

Hi, Looking at implementing Inter-AS VPN Option C with route reflectors similar to: http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/erx/junose71/swconfig-bgp-mpls/ html/bgp-mpls-apps-config8.html However, we're implementing using M-series routers not ERX. Does a similar command to "neighbor next-hop-un