[j-nsp] 10.4R9 on MX stable?

2012-02-17 Thread Paul Stewart
Hey there. We need to upgrade from our 10.0R3.10 releases on MX platform. Up until a month ago we were ready to roll to recommended release 10.4R8 and well, we know that wasn't exactly a perfect solution ;) Has anyone got 10.4R9 running on MX platform in production yet? I'm looking for

Re: [j-nsp] 10.4R9 on MX stable?

2012-02-17 Thread OBrien, Will
I'm running 10.4R7.5 for now. I haven't even loaded R9 yet. On Feb 17, 2012, at 10:18 AM, Paul Stewart wrote: Hey there. We need to upgrade from our 10.0R3.10 releases on MX platform. Up until a month ago we were ready to roll to recommended release 10.4R8 and well, we know that

Re: [j-nsp] 10.4R9 on MX stable?

2012-02-17 Thread Paul Stewart
: [j-nsp] 10.4R9 on MX stable? I'm running 10.4R7.5 for now. I haven't even loaded R9 yet. On Feb 17, 2012, at 10:18 AM, Paul Stewart wrote: Hey there. We need to upgrade from our 10.0R3.10 releases on MX platform. Up until a month ago we were ready to roll to recommended release 10.4R8

Re: [j-nsp] 10.4R9 on MX stable?

2012-02-17 Thread Daniel Verlouw
Hi, On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 17:18, Paul Stewart p...@paulstewart.org wrote: Has anyone got 10.4R9 running on MX platform in production yet?  I'm looking for any feedback as JTAC is recommending we go to this release. hopefully I can share some results on Tuesday...looks fine in the lab so far,

Re: [j-nsp] 10.4R9 on MX stable?

2012-02-17 Thread Serge Vautour
We've had it loaded in the lab for a week now. Nothing seems broken yet. We're still testing. Serge From: Paul Stewart p...@paulstewart.org To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 12:18:02 PM Subject: [j-nsp] 10.4R9 on MX stable? Hey

Re: [j-nsp] 10.4R9 on MX stable?

2012-02-17 Thread Chris Kawchuk
From: Paul Stewart p...@paulstewart.org To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 12:18:02 PM Subject: [j-nsp] 10.4R9 on MX stable? Hey there. We need to upgrade from our 10.0R3.10 releases on MX platform. Up until a month ago we were ready to roll

Re: [j-nsp] 10.4R9 on MX stable?

2012-02-17 Thread Amos Rosenboim
Hi, It seems there is a common agreement that 10.4R8 is not the release to Ho with. Now I feel left out of the party, as I have no idea what you folks are talking about. I am also feeling a little nervous, as we are in the staging phase of a 12 router network and they are all running 10.4R8.

Re: [j-nsp] 10.4R9 on MX stable?

2012-02-17 Thread Paul Stewart
] 10.4R9 on MX stable? We've had it loaded in the lab for a week now. Nothing seems broken yet. We're still testing. Serge _ From: Paul Stewart p...@paulstewart.org To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 12:18:02 PM Subject: [j-nsp] 10.4R9 on MX stable? Hey

Re: [j-nsp] 10.4R9 on MX stable?

2012-02-17 Thread Jack Bates
On 2/17/2012 10:27 AM, Paul Stewart wrote: Thanks.. We're also ok with going to an 11.x release if there's a such thing as a golden release in the 11.x code...;) I had to jump to 11.2 for static units with auto-configure on the same interface on an MX80 for subscriber services. Running

Re: [j-nsp] 10.4R9 on MX stable?

2012-02-17 Thread Paul Stewart
] Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 7:53 PM To: Paul Stewart Cc: 'OBrien, Will'; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] 10.4R9 on MX stable? On 2/17/2012 10:27 AM, Paul Stewart wrote: Thanks.. We're also ok with going to an 11.x release if there's a such thing as a golden release