uting
protocol.
Re: [j-nsp] 13 Tips for Passing Juniper Lab Tests
Scott Morris
to:
Richard A Steenbergen
06/29/09 05:13 PM
Sent by:
juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
Cc:
Juniper Puck
Please respond to swm
I feel a need to jump in here and note that this person noted below was
Joseph Soricelli
CEO
Proteus Networks
703-980-3999
j...@proteus.net
www.proteus.net
Twitter - @proteusnetworks
On Jun 29, 2009, at 7:34 PM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 06:24:57PM -0400, Joseph Soricelli wrote:
In all seriousness part of my advice does include having
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 06:24:57PM -0400, Joseph Soricelli wrote:
> In all seriousness part of my advice does include having a good
> breakfast - in addition to getting a good night's sleep and arriving
> early to the testing center. When I was proctoring these exams from
> 2001-2005 I can't
In all seriousness part of my advice does include having a good
breakfast - in addition to getting a good night's sleep and arriving
early to the testing center. When I was proctoring these exams from
2001-2005 I can't tell you how many people failed due to feeling
rushed (arrived at 8:55)
key to me. How many quad
CCIE's are there in the world now 12? Also, how many of them update
route filters for a living? They are usually pretty high up
(deserving or no). In Scott's case he was just nominated as
everyone's favorite routing protocol.
*Re: [j-n
I feel a need to jump in here and note that this person noted below was
most certainly not me (grin).
But yes, you're right, they can't test for stupid. Any of these tests
are meant to test technology knowledge. That's done through
artificially strange scenarios.
The rest is experience.
a comment for all to read on the post :)
>
> Dan Farrell
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Chris Grundemann
> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 3:15 PM
> To: Juniper Puck
&g
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 02:44:44PM -0600, Mark Calkins wrote:
> DUUUDE Really? flame a guy for trying to be helpful. At least we don't
> need a comprehensive test for being an asshole.
*Shrug* I wasn't aware that dropping a link to your own blog full of
advice that could best be described as "ge
Steenbergen
Cc: Juniper Puck
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] 13 Tips for Passing Juniper Lab Tests
DUUUDE Really? flame a guy for trying to be helpful. At least we don't
need a comprehensive test for being an asshole.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 01
DUUUDE Really? flame a guy for trying to be helpful. At least we don't
need a comprehensive test for being an asshole.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 01:14:52PM -0600, Chris Grundemann wrote:
> > New blog post that folks on this list migh
] 13 Tips for Passing Juniper Lab Tests
New blog post that folks on this list might find interesting / worth
reading: http://bit.ly/43A7K (13 Tips for Passing Juniper Lab Tests)
~Chris
--
Chris Grundemann
weblog.chrisgrundemann.com
www.twitter.com/chrisgrundemann
www.coisoc.org
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 01:14:52PM -0600, Chris Grundemann wrote:
> New blog post that folks on this list might find interesting / worth
> reading: http://bit.ly/43A7K (13 Tips for Passing Juniper Lab Tests)
> ~Chris
Dude, really? Study a lot, read the question thoroughly, manage your
time carefu
New blog post that folks on this list might find interesting / worth
reading: http://bit.ly/43A7K (13 Tips for Passing Juniper Lab Tests)
~Chris
--
Chris Grundemann
weblog.chrisgrundemann.com
www.twitter.com/chrisgrundemann
www.coisoc.org
___
juniper-
13 matches
Mail list logo
