On Monday, October 01, 2012 06:30:19 PM Skeeve Stevens
wrote:
What features would you be using the ASR9k for over the
MX80's?
It's a price thing :-).
Technically, the ASR9001 can deliver 40Gbps ports on the
chassis. That's one reason to choose it over the MX80 (that
and the possibility
On Tuesday, August 07, 2012 08:22:37 AM William Jackson
wrote:
Having used the MX80 in a previous position and now being
prompted to look at the ASR 9001, I was wondering if any
people have operational experience with the ASR9001
platform? Or any thoughts on comparison.
I see no one replied
What features would you be using the ASR9k for over the MX80's?
...Skeeve
*
*
*Skeeve Stevens, CEO - *eintellego Pty Ltd
ske...@eintellego.net ; www.eintellego.net
Phone: 1300 753 383; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
facebook.com/eintellego ; http://twitter.com/networkceoau
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] ASR9001 vs MX80
Hello.
Yes and no. Yes, but befor using Trio Chipset, No because now for example
MX480 system capacity is 1.92 Tbps. If I am wrong, please correct me.
2012/8/8 Xu Hu jstuxuhu0...@gmail.commailto:jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com
Is any reason juniper choose the 5 for mx5, 40
Is any reason juniper choose the 5 for mx5, 40 for mx40, 480 for mx480? The
number is for backplane bandwidth?
Thanks and regards,
Xu Hu
On 8 Aug, 2012, at 5:30, Doug Hanks dha...@juniper.net wrote:
Please note there's also the MX5 through MX40 that can be upgraded via a
license to a full
Hello.
Yes and no. Yes, but befor using Trio Chipset, No because now for example
MX480 system capacity is 1.92 Tbps. If I am wrong, please correct me.
2012/8/8 Xu Hu jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com
Is any reason juniper choose the 5 for mx5, 40 for mx40, 480 for mx480?
The number is for backplane
,
juniper-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
juniper-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] ASR9001 vs MX80
Hello.
Yes and no. Yes, but befor using Trio Chipset, No because now for example MX480
system capacity is 1.92 Tbps. If I am wrong
Hi
Having used the MX80 in a previous position and now being prompted to look at
the ASR 9001, I was wondering if any people have operational experience with
the ASR9001 platform?
Or any thoughts on comparison.
These will be used for IPv4/IPv6 eBGP transit and for MPLS L2VPN/VPLS drop
offs,
Hi,
have a look at:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/2012-May/023303.html
and the whole thread:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/2012-April/023068.html
They are about mx480 vs ASR9006, but most of stuff still applies.
On 07.08.2012 10:22, William Jackson wrote:
Please note there's also the MX5 through MX40 that can be upgraded via a
license to a full MX80 as well.
On 8/7/12 1:56 AM, Tima Maryin timamar...@mail.ru wrote:
Hi,
have a look at:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/2012-May/023303.html
and the whole thread:
10 matches
Mail list logo