[j-nsp] BGP Communities

2010-05-05 Thread Paul Stewart
Good morning.. I hope I'm not being a pain to folks on the list.. J So we have our first MX480 up and running now - things are progressing along nicely thanks to all the help from this list. OSPF, IPv4/IPv6, iBGP up and running. Having a small issue around eBGP peering. When I bring up a

Re: [j-nsp] BGP Communities

2010-05-05 Thread Felix Schueren
Paul, When I do show route community 11666:5000 I get a list of the proper prefixes as expected. 11666:5000 is our own network routes. The same occurs when I list 11666:4000 which is customer network routes - displays the list correctly. This confirms in my mind that the MX480 is receiving

Re: [j-nsp] BGP Communities

2010-05-05 Thread Smith W. Stacy
Hi Paul, Your current outbound policy will only match routes that have BOTH 11666:4000 AND 11666:5000. These statements: from community outbound-xx; community outbound- members [ 11666:4000 11666:5000 ]; result in a logical AND. Instead, you probably want something

Re: [j-nsp] BGP Communities

2010-05-05 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 10:05:42AM -0400, Paul Stewart wrote: community inbound- members [ 11666:2000 11666:2002 ]; community outbound- members [ 11666:4000 11666:5000 ]; Defining multiple members like this is how you implement a logical AND, so both members will be required if

Re: [j-nsp] BGP Communities

2010-05-05 Thread Alex
, 2010 3:41 PM Subject: Re: [j-nsp] BGP Communities Hi Paul, Your current outbound policy will only match routes that have BOTH 11666:4000 AND 11666:5000. These statements: from community outbound-xx; community outbound- members [ 11666:4000 11666:5000 ]; result

Re: [j-nsp] BGP Communities

2010-05-05 Thread Andrey Zarechansky
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 10:05:42AM -0400, Paul Stewart wrote: Hi, Paul! [dd] In the Cisco world, we had to define network statements of our own subnets and route those blocks to Null0 in order to advertise. I'm thinking something similar here in JunOS? You can check what is actually

Re: [j-nsp] BGP Communities

2010-05-05 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 04:24:04PM +0100, Alex wrote: Hello there, Below regex works too: community inbound- members (11666:2000)|(11666:2002) The downside to this is you can't add communities using the same named definition, since regexp can only be used to match. If you have two

Re: [j-nsp] BGP communities for direct routes

2007-08-10 Thread Eric Van Tol
-customer; } then accept; } then reject; HTH, evt -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lev Garantin Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 9:27 AM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] BGP communities for direct routes Hello

Re: [j-nsp] BGP communities for direct routes

2007-08-10 Thread Erdem Sener
direct ]; community origin-customer; } then accept; } then reject; HTH, evt -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lev Garantin Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 9:27 AM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp