Hi,
> On one of my MX204 routers the DHCP relay crashes after some running time
and the process stops.
if you are looking for a temporary workaround, then you could periodically
check if the jdhcpd process is running and if it isn't, then restart it.
Something like this:
https://gist.github.com/t
On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 13:48:16 +0200
Baldur Norddahl wrote:
> [snip]
>
> I can open a case with JTAC for the cause of the crash, but I am
> thinking about how to monitor the relay.
In the past I have used traceoptions, which was helpful.
Under system, processes, dhcp-service, traceoption
Once upon a time, Baldur Norddahl said:
> What options do we have for monitoring running processes on the
> router? Are there other processes than DHCP that should be monitored
> too?
JUNOS implements many of the standard SNMP MIBs, which include
information about open TCP/UDP ports, so you could
> On 9/07/2020, at 23:48, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> On one of my MX204 routers the DHCP relay crashes after some running time and
> the process stops. It is not restarted automatically but will start again
> with the following command:
What version are you on? Are you running IPv6
Hello
On one of my MX204 routers the DHCP relay crashes after some running
time and the process stops. It is not restarted automatically but will
start again with the following command:
admin@gc-edge1> restart dhcp-service
error: Junos Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol process is not runnin
Anderson, Charles R [c...@wpi.edu] wrote:
>
> bootp helper requires you to specify the routing-instance. Have you done
> that?
>
> set forwarding-options helpers bootp interface irb.2287 server 10.0.1.10
> routing-instance FOO
> set forwarding-options helpers bootp interface irb.2287 server 10
I feel like I hit this once and had to use a rib-group.
But it would probably be helpful to see the relevant configs in full.
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 10:52 PM Anderson, Charles R wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 03:41:40PM -0800, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> > Nathan Ward [nw...@daork.net] wrote:
>
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 03:41:40PM -0800, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Nathan Ward [nw...@daork.net] wrote:
> > Hi Chris, check out the forward-only-replies option, pretty sure there was
> > some stuff there I had to fiddle with.
> >
> > Can you post your config?
> >
>
> I'm using the bootp helper
Aaron1 [aar...@gvtc.com] wrote:
> I use the per-vrf dhcp-relay in ACX5048
Yeah when I use that I have both 1. a similar problem (replies are not
sent to the destination vrf) and 2. the router won't forward replies to
destination PE routers anymore.
___
j
I use the per-vrf dhcp-relay in ACX5048
Aaron
> On Dec 19, 2018, at 5:41 PM, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
>
> Nathan Ward [nw...@daork.net] wrote:
>> Hi Chris, check out the forward-only-replies option, pretty sure there was
>> some stuff there I had to fiddle with.
>>
>> Can you post your config?
Nathan Ward [nw...@daork.net] wrote:
> Hi Chris, check out the forward-only-replies option, pretty sure there was
> some stuff there I had to fiddle with.
>
> Can you post your config?
>
I'm using the bootp helper instead of the dhcp-relay feature. I don't know
if 'fud' handles both. When I tri
Aaron1 [aar...@gvtc.com] wrote:
> Dang typos...
>
> Did you apply local prefix leaking feature using auto-export to get multiple
> vrfs talking on same PE ?
>
> https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/release-independent/nce/topics/concept/auto-export-overview.html
>
I'm using auto-export
Dang typos...
Did you apply local prefix leaking feature using auto-export to get multiple
vrfs talking on same PE ?
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/release-independent/nce/topics/concept/auto-export-overview.html
Aaron
> On Dec 19, 2018, at 1:13 PM, Aaron1 wrote:
>
> aside from
aside from proper RT import/export...
Auto export to get multiple vrfs taking on some PE ?
Aaron
> On Dec 19, 2018, at 12:57 PM, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
>
> I have no trouble with dhcp relay between VRFs across MPLS PE routers,
> but across VRFs on the same router, the relay daemon fud fails.
>
I have no trouble with dhcp relay between VRFs across MPLS PE routers,
but across VRFs on the same router, the relay daemon fud fails.
If I turn on debugging, I am always getting:
Dec 18 19:49:06 FUD_RTSOCK_MSG_FAILURE: Unable to get prefix match: No such
file or directory
Dec 18 19:49:06 reply
I'm troubleshooting a network issue with an appliance that isn't getting on our
network. We've already solved one problem (hash-collision causing the MAC not
to be learned), and JTAC is working on that. However, even with that worked
around, the equipment isn't getting a DHCP address. We susp
Hi all,
I'm not too sure what I'm doing wrong here
I have several VRF's, and want to pass dhcp requests to another vrf...
VRF config:
instance-type vrf;
interface ge-1/1/0.512;
interface ge-1/1/0.602;
interface ge-1/1/0.2064;
interface ge-1/1/0.2068;
interface ge-1/1/0.2072;
interface ge-1
Hello,
I'm trying to set up dhcp relay with option 82 on a juniper srx210-hm
(10.1R1.8).
The relay works well but when I configure under the interface ([edit
forwarding-options helpers bootp interface XXX], or under the bootp
global configuration ([edit forwarding-options helpers bootp]) this :
9.6R1 is an old release. As far as I seen, DHCP relay functions were fixed in
later releases, try to upgrade to 9.6R2 or R3.
On Jan 25, 2010, at 8:42 PM, Kevin Wormington wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm using (or at least trying to) extended DHCP Relay on JunOS 9.6R1.3 on
> M7i. I have noticed that
Hi All,
I'm using (or at least trying to) extended DHCP Relay on JunOS 9.6R1.3
on M7i. I have noticed that when you enable DHCP relay on an interface
then it drops transit traffic that is udp port 67 on *any* interface.
I have a JTAC ticket open and they are telling me this is expected
beha
to forward if different, include the
> routing-instance statement.
>
> Regards,
> Masood
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marlon Duksa
> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 11:01 PM
> To: Nicolaj Kamensek
> C
@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] dhcp-relay on MX
Still no luck. This is what I have. Also there is no firewall in this
network.
forwarding-options {
helpers {
bootp {
server 10.0.0.100;
relay-agent-option;
}
}
}
interfaces { <---client s
Still no luck. This is what I have. Also there is no firewall in this
network.
forwarding-options {
helpers {
bootp {
server 10.0.0.100;
relay-agent-option;
}
}
}
interfaces { <---client side
ge-0/0/0 {
unit 0 {
fami
Marlon Duksa schrieb:
HiDoes anyone know why DHCP discover packets are not relayed through an MX
from my client to en external DHCP server that resides on the same network
as one on the interfaces on MX (I can ping this DHCP server from the MX).
Keep in mind that dhcp-relay is done via the rout
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
I don't see any mention of which *interface* to run the DHCP helper on
under your forwarding-options. I believe you need that.
No, that's not required here.
--
Accelerated IT Services GmbH
Schubertstrasse 10D-67251 Freinsheim
[EMAIL PROTECTED
> Does anyone know why DHCP discover packets are not relayed through an MX
> from my client to en external DHCP server that resides on the same network
> as one on the interfaces on MX (I can ping this DHCP server from the MX).
I don't see any mention of which *interface* to run the DHCP helper on
HiDoes anyone know why DHCP discover packets are not relayed through an MX
from my client to en external DHCP server that resides on the same network
as one on the interfaces on MX (I can ping this DHCP server from the MX).
I see DHCP Discover packet come in from the client side but nothing going
o
James Cornman schrieb:
> I assume you have a route to 194.187.164.2?
Jep, it's directly connected to ae0.200.
Best regards,
Nicolaj Kamensek
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Hi James,
still not working. That's what I see in the Juniper logfile:
Mar 29 21:41:05 fud_config_bootp_get_defaults(): bootps defaults set
Mar 29 21:41:05 no route instance new sale addr 194.187.164.2 port 67
routing instance default
Mar 29 21:41:05 fud_config_bootp_get_interface(): added ae0.1
James Cornman schrieb:
> I have not specified any of the max-hop-count or minimum-wait-time
> settings and mine works. Perhaps thats where your problems are stemming
> from. Also, it seems your server statement in the bootp stanza is
> extraneous.
Hi James,
thanks for your quick answer, I will
Hi all,
I need to do dhcp-relay on a Juniper M20 here. This is the setup:
M20 with 2x GigE for the customer-links and required is a dhcp-relay
from ae0.199 to ae0.200 which is the net of the dhcp-server.
This is the configuration:
helpers {
bootp {
description DHCP-Relay;
31 matches
Mail list logo
