Re: [j-nsp] EX 4200 stability with BGP and OSPF redistribution ?

2010-06-22 Thread Julien Goodwin
On 22/06/10 18:13, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: With a healthy dose of complex commit scripts you can get an MX commit time up to 20 seconds in no time flat. Well at least you could, I noticed they did something in 9.6 to make it a lot faster (at least for me, with commit sync, etc). EX on the

Re: [j-nsp] EX 4200 stability with BGP and OSPF redistribution ?

2010-06-22 Thread Laurent HENRY
Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Laurent HENRY Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 6:29 AM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] EX 4200 stability with BGP and OSPF redistribution ? Hi all, I am

Re: [j-nsp] EX 4200 stability with BGP and OSPF redistribution ?

2010-06-22 Thread Dan Farrell
Message- From: Laurent HENRY [mailto:laurent.he...@ehess.fr] Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 5:23 AM To: Dan Farrell Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] EX 4200 stability with BGP and OSPF redistribution ? Thank you ! No weird bugs encountered ? Le Monday 21 Ju4ne 2010 23:25:13

Re: [j-nsp] EX 4200 stability with BGP and OSPF redistribution ?

2010-06-22 Thread Cyrill Malevanov
, 2010 5:23 AM To: Dan Farrell Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] EX 4200 stability with BGP and OSPF redistribution ? Thank you ! No weird bugs encountered ? Le Monday 21 Ju4ne 2010 23:25:13 Dan Farrell, vous avez écrit : We leverage the EX3200 and 4200's extensively in our

Re: [j-nsp] EX 4200 stability with BGP and OSPF redistribution ?

2010-06-22 Thread Dan Farrell
: [j-nsp] EX 4200 stability with BGP and OSPF redistribution ? We have a lot of routing problems on EX4200 VC's. Standalone EX works fine, but routing on high loads using VC - is a pain. Some routing loss, packets loss etc. Cyrill On 22.06.2010 17:59, Dan Farrell wrote: Not in -this- version

[j-nsp] EX 4200 stability with BGP and OSPF redistribution ?

2010-06-21 Thread Laurent HENRY
Hi all, I am thinking about using two EX 4200 as redondant border routers of my main Internet link. In this design, I would then need to use BGP with my ISP and OSPF for inside route redistribution. Reading the archive, and on my own experience with the product too, i am looking for

Re: [j-nsp] EX 4200 stability with BGP and OSPF redistribution ?

2010-06-21 Thread Mark Tinka
On Monday 21 June 2010 06:29:00 pm Laurent HENRY wrote: Does anyone actually use these features actively with this platform ? We once used 2x EX4200-24F's as routers located in the centre of a core network built to drive a regional operator conference. They ran iBGP + IS-IS (IPv6 support

Re: [j-nsp] EX 4200 stability with BGP and OSPF redistribution ?

2010-06-21 Thread Ross Vandegrift
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:29:00PM +0200, Laurent HENRY wrote: Hi all, I am thinking about using two EX 4200 as redondant border routers of my main Internet link. In this design, I would then need to use BGP with my ISP and OSPF for inside route redistribution. Reading the

Re: [j-nsp] EX 4200 stability with BGP and OSPF redistribution ?

2010-06-21 Thread Dan Farrell
Of Laurent HENRY Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 6:29 AM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] EX 4200 stability with BGP and OSPF redistribution ? Hi all, I am thinking about using two EX 4200 as redondant border routers of my main Internet link. In this design, I would then need

Re: [j-nsp] EX 4200 stability with BGP and OSPF redistribution ?

2010-06-21 Thread Kevin Oberman
From: Dan Farrell da...@appliedi.net Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:33:50 -0700 Sender: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net With 10.0.S1.1 the only headaches we encounter with our loaded configuration on a 2-member 4200 stack (~850+ RVI's total, some on OSPF) is the time it takes for the