On Friday 13 March 2009 02:22:26 am Tore Anderson wrote:
I'll have to monitor the memory utilisation on the
routers for a few more days before I can be certain that
we've nailed the bug, though, but I'm feeling optimistic.
You'll probably want to try disabling the process
yourself. Let me
The question is whether the reboot will be to downgrade to
9.3R2.8, upgrade to the next 9.4 release that fixes this
issue or stick to this release. We're more inclined to the
latter options as 9.4 fixes the traceroute bug seen in MPLS-
based BGP-free cores.
Could you expand a bit on the
On Monday 16 March 2009 11:58:49 pm sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
Could you expand a bit on the traceroute bug and how this
is visible?
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/juniper/16700
PR/396280
Although JTAC say this issue is resolved in 9.3R3 for the
9.3 code base. However, as mentioned
Mark,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Mark Tinka mti...@globaltransit.net wrote:
It creates a fairly large log file under '/mfs/var/lpdfd/'
every 8hrs, approximately, which, as you say, is where the
leak is occurring.
We've disabled this process too and see RE memory
utilization
Hey,
I'll keep you posted if I learn more, and thanks in advance for doing
the same...
The fine folks from nLogic and JTAC have a theory now, which is that the
leak is related to a new process introduced in 9.4 called lpdfd. It's
not something I've been using, so disabling it was not a
On Fri, February 27, 2009 14:12, Mark Tinka wrote:
Hi all.
Anyone notice what looks like an RE memory leak/usage growth
post a JunOS 9.4R1.8 upgrade?
we experienced a similar problem on various gear (MX/M/T) with 9.4R1.8.
symptoms are either rpd crashing with malloc failure, or rpd getting
On Thursday 05 March 2009 07:38:21 pm Johannes Resch wrote:
we experienced a similar problem on various gear (MX/M/T)
with 9.4R1.8.
We've been pulling our hair out of our heads trying to
figure out what could be causing the leak :-).
We have a case open with JTAC, but they have us trending
Hi,
* Mark Tinka
Anyone notice what looks like an RE memory leak/usage growth
post a JunOS 9.4R1.8 upgrade?
System here is RE-850 in an M7i with 1.5GB of DRAM.
cflowd suspected; we've disabled it and appear to have
arrested further growth in usage.
I just had a MX 240 with 9.4R1.8
On Friday 06 March 2009 01:49:37 am Tore Anderson wrote:
Hi,
Hi Tore.
Great feedback, thanks.
We're using cflowd but not IS-IS.
I think we might have ruled out cflowd, as we discontinued
sampling but still see the memory leak, sitting at some 75%
today, from a regular 45% about two weeks
Once upon a time, Mark Tinka mti...@globaltransit.net said:
We were happy with 9.3R2.8, but need to support the enhanced
CFEB's, so...
Funny you should mention that... I'm seeing SNMP problems on 9.3R2.8,
with both J-series and a couple of M10is.
On the J-series, I've got one in a remote POP
10 matches
Mail list logo
