Re: [j-nsp] Juniper - Cisco Catalyst Fast Ether Channel Load Balancing

2008-01-28 Thread Ariff Premji
You need a policy exported to the forwarding table. This policy is required for all flow-based load-balancing as well as for FRR. The "per-packet" keyword is misleading. It doesent really mean per-packet. Add this to your config and it should take care of the load-balancing. policy-options

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper - Cisco Catalyst Fast Ether Channel Load Balancing

2008-01-28 Thread David Ball
As per the URL I sent, it also requires JunOS 8.0 or later. David On 28/01/2008, a. rahman isnaini r.sutan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > M Series, David. > > > rgs > a. rahman isnaini r.sutan > > David Ball wrote: > > Are you using a J-series router? Multiservice family isn't > > supported o

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper - Cisco Catalyst Fast Ether Channel Load Balancing

2008-01-28 Thread David Ball
Are you using a J-series router? Multiservice family isn't supported on J-series routers. David On 28/01/2008, a. rahman isnaini r.sutan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi David, > > Unfortunately under forwarding-options hash-key, i found only family > without multiservice behind. > > This me

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper - Cisco Catalyst Fast Ether Channel Load Balancing

2008-01-28 Thread David Ball
Take a look at the [edit forwarding-options] section, specifically the 'hash-key' section for multiservice if you're just doing L2 across the bundle: http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos85/swconfig85-policy/id-10568390.html David On 28/01/2008, a. r.isnaini. rangkayo sutan <[

[j-nsp] Juniper - Cisco Catalyst Fast Ether Channel Load Balancing

2008-01-28 Thread a. r.isnaini. rangkayo sutan
Hi, Any suggestion will be very appreciated. Here's the scheme : Ports aggregation with trunking was success between Juniper - Cisco Catalyst, but i'm having problem with the load that is not balanced on each port. It might be the config still missing one line somewhere :) interfaces { fe-