(415)902-5702
-Original Message-
From: Eugeniu Patrascu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 11:33 AM
To: Stefan Fouant
Cc: Doug Marschke; Richard A Steenbergen; David Ball; Eric Van Tol;
juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net; matthew zeier
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper support
Stefan Fouant wrote:
And I thought privacy concerns were bad enough with all these apps on
my PC dialing "home", now I have to worry about my routers doing it
too? ;)
Well, Hitachi does it for their storage systems and nobody freaks out.
Having a router dial home seems to me that it has signi
Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard A
> Steenbergen
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 8:47 PM
> To: David Ball
> Cc: Eric Van Tol; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net; matthew zeier
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper support vs. Cisco TAC - exper
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard A
Steenbergen
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 8:47 PM
To: David Ball
Cc: Eric Van Tol; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net; matthew zeier
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper support vs. Cisco TAC - experiences?
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 06:25:07PM -0
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 08:50:50AM -0500, Boyd, Benjamin R wrote:
> I agree, the web interface with Juniper is far superior to Cisco's.
> For any "non-critical" issue I rarely even have to speak with JTAC it's
> all accomplished via e-mail/messaging.
On the Netscreen side of the fence, it's a dif
nbergen
Cc: Eric Van Tol; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net; matthew zeier
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper support vs. Cisco TAC - experiences?
Another thing which I (and surely most of you) try to do is inundate
them with data when opening a case right at the get-go, in hopes of
avoiding the mundane questio
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 06:25:07PM -0600, David Ball wrote:
> Another thing which I (and surely most of you) try to do is inundate
> them with data when opening a case right at the get-go, in hopes of
> avoiding the mundane questions Richard alluded to. Not just a 'req
> sup info', but attach an
Another thing which I (and surely most of you) try to do is inundate
them with data when opening a case right at the get-go, in hopes of
avoiding the mundane questions Richard alluded to. Not just a 'req
sup info', but attach any core files (/var/crash I think), many of the
log files found in /v
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 10:56:22AM -0600, David Ball wrote:
> I agree with Stefan on the knowledge of the initial ticket handlers.
> I've had great support for the most part, but far too often the
> ticket (and attachments) aren't read thoroughly, and as such I need to
> explain myself several t
gt; -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Van Tol
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 6:47 AM
>> To: 'Wink'; matthew zeier
>> Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
>> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper su
t; all accomplished via e-mail/messaging.
>
> -Ben
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Van Tol
> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 6:47 AM
> To: 'Wink'; matthew zeier
> Cc: juniper-nsp@pu
Of Eric Van Tol
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 6:47 AM
To: 'Wink'; matthew zeier
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper support vs. Cisco TAC - experiences?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:juniper-nsp-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On B
On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 22:55 -0700, matthew zeier wrote:
> I'm looking at the EX4200 as an alternative to Cisco's 3750G. The
> EX4200 is much less expensive than a comparable 3750G.
>
> Current network is all Cisco and I don't have any experience dealing
> with Juniper support outside of a coupl
Wednesday, May 28, 2008 6:46 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper support vs. Cisco TAC - experiences?
> IMHO, you don't typically get the support you need until you are at a
Tier 2 type level anyway.
I agree with Wink, on
Hi Matthew,
CDP, along with other Cisco proprietary protocols, is treated as a
multicast packet and forwarded to all the ports
within the vlan on EX boxes. It obviosly is not originated and/or terminated.
HTH
Erdem
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 7:55 AM, matthew zeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:juniper-nsp-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wink
> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 7:35 AM
> To: matthew zeier
> Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper support vs. Cisco TAC - experiences
> IMHO, you don't typically get the support you need until you are at a
Tier 2 type level anyway.
I agree with Wink, only advanced JTAC give you a real help.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listin
Also, to answer your question..
I have some experience with JTAC. They are "on par" with Cisco from my
perspective in terms of responsiveness and quality of support.
I think they are about the same, though I'm sure either one will say
they are much better than the other.
IMHO, you don't typi
The G series phones support LLDPv2 for voice VLAN info...
matthew zeier wrote:
> I'm looking at the EX4200 as an alternative to Cisco's 3750G. The
> EX4200 is much less expensive than a comparable 3750G.
>
> Current network is all Cisco and I don't have any experience dealing
> with Juniper s
On Tue, 27 May 2008, matthew zeier wrote:
> I'm looking at the EX4200 as an alternative to Cisco's 3750G. The
> EX4200 is much less expensive than a comparable 3750G.
>
> Oh, and Juniper doesn't do VTP or CDP (or Cisco doesn't do LLDP)!
Cisco does support LLDP, which is the way to go anyway.
LLD
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 10:55:38PM -0700, matthew zeier wrote:
> Oh, and Juniper doesn't do VTP or CDP (or Cisco doesn't do LLDP)!
Cisco 3750 definitely does LLDP, upgrade your code. As for VTP, if you
really want to configure that piece of crap you need to have your head
examined. :)
--
Richa
I'm looking at the EX4200 as an alternative to Cisco's 3750G. The
EX4200 is much less expensive than a comparable 3750G.
Current network is all Cisco and I don't have any experience dealing
with Juniper support outside of a couple SSG-5 issues. I think the
largest barrier to Juniper is their
22 matches
Mail list logo
