Re: [j-nsp] Juniper uRPF implementation

On Sunday 07 December 2008 05:41:19 Diogo Montagner wrote: > I think it is based on forwarding plane because when you > configure uRPF on a multi-homed environment you need > issue the command "set routing-options forwarding-table > unicast-reverse-path feasible-paths". You can find this > on JNCI

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper uRPF implementation

Hi German, I think it is based on forwarding plane because when you configure uRPF on a multi-homed environment you need issue the command "set routing-options forwarding-table unicast-reverse-path feasible-paths". You can find this on JNCIS-M study guide. But there is no mention about default rou

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper uRPF implementation

On Wed, 3 Dec 2008, German Martinez wrote: We have an scenario where we have a bunch of routes in the routing table (RE) but we only let one default route go to the PFE. We achieve that by using forwarding filters. Could someone clarify Juniper's uRPF implementation, when only a default route

[j-nsp] Juniper uRPF implementation

Hello, We have an scenario where we have a bunch of routes in the routing table (RE) but we only let one default route go to the PFE. We achieve that by using forwarding filters. Could someone clarify Juniper's uRPF implementation, when only a default route is installed in the PFE? Are the uRPF