On 18/05/15 12:49, Saku Ytti wrote:
I'm personally not too excited about templates in IOS, as I tend to
have only like 3-5 peer-groups in IOS, and if I translate the config
to template based, the amount of lines in my config increases. I think
the break-even would require rather large amount of
On 18/May/15 14:11, Scott Granados wrote:
I’m not sure exactly what you’re looking for but the peer group system under
JunOS is fairly efficient. If you set your export and import policies per
group the bgp process will place these in a peer group and dynamically break
off slow members
I’m not sure exactly what you’re looking for but the peer group system under
JunOS is fairly efficient. If you set your export and import policies per
group the bgp process will place these in a peer group and dynamically break
off slow members in to their own groups so that one slower peer
Hi Saku,
Saku Ytti [mailto:s...@ytti.fi]
Sent: 18 May 2015 12:50
On 18 May 2015 at 14:00, Adam Vitkovsky adam.vitkov...@gamma.co.uk
wrote:
Hey Adam,
Yes I'm thinking about BGP Dynamic Update Peer-Groups
- the improved BGP update message generation where the update-group
From: Mark Tinka [mailto:mark.ti...@seacom.mu]
Sent: 18 May 2015 13:23
On 18/May/15 14:11, Scott Granados wrote:
I'm not sure exactly what you're looking for but the peer group system
under JunOS is fairly efficient. If you set your export and import policies
per
group the bgp process
On May 18, 2015, at 8:08 AM, Julien Goodwin jgood...@studio442.com.au wrote:
On 18/05/15 21:49, Saku Ytti wrote:
The update-groups are created dynamically in JunOS as far as I know.
That is if you have BGP group where neighbors have unique export
policies, you will have multiple
On 18/05/15 21:49, Saku Ytti wrote:
The update-groups are created dynamically in JunOS as far as I know.
That is if you have BGP group where neighbors have unique export
policies, you will have multiple update-groups in configuration group.
But I guess if you have two neighbors with same
Hi folks,
I'd like to ask if the 90's way of BGP generating updates per peer-group is a
cause for concern on a modern gear.
And if not then anyways am I the only one missing some flexibility in BGP peers
configuration in Junos?
It's really annoying that every time one needs to adjust something
On (2015-05-18 10:04 +), Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
Hey Adam,
I'd like to ask if the 90's way of BGP generating updates per peer-group is
a cause for concern on a modern gear.
And if not then anyways am I the only one missing some flexibility in BGP
peers configuration in Junos?
It's
Hey buddy,
Saku Ytti
Sent: 18 May 2015 11:12
On (2015-05-18 10:04 +), Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
Hey Adam,
I'd like to ask if the 90's way of BGP generating updates per peer-group
is
a cause for concern on a modern gear.
And if not then anyways am I the only one missing some
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 10:04:00AM +, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
Hi folks,
I'd like to ask if the 90's way of BGP generating updates per peer-group
is a cause for concern on a modern gear.
And if not then anyways am I the only one missing some flexibility in
BGP peers configuration in
On 18 May 2015 at 14:00, Adam Vitkovsky adam.vitkov...@gamma.co.uk wrote:
Hey Adam,
Yes I'm thinking about BGP Dynamic Update Peer-Groups
- the improved BGP update message generation where the update-group
memberships is calculated automatically/dynamically by the system based on
common
12 matches
Mail list logo
