ther.net] On Behalf Of Ben Dale
> Sent: Thursday, 20 December 2012 11:25 PM
> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net List
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] LDP on ex4200/3200 seriesand 1RU LSR?
>
>
>
> On 20/12/2012, at 4:58 PM, Michel de Nostredame
> wrote:
>
> > Possibly Junipe
This one is still bugging me probably because I don't know the nitty details of
how these ASICs work but i wonder if they couldn't reduce the total frame size
by X bytes to cope with extended labelling?
Sent from some sort of iDevice.
On 20/12/2012, at 1:00 PM, Tim Jackson wrote:
> It can't e
To: Ben Dale; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] LDP on ex4200/3200 series..and 1RU LSR?
No multicast today either... just a head ups :(
L3VPNs also missing until the end of the month..
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun
@puck.nether.net List
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] LDP on ex4200/3200 seriesand 1RU LSR?
On 20/12/2012, at 4:58 PM, Michel de Nostredame
wrote:
> Possibly Juniper is positioning ACX for that?
> But ACX has far lower port density and those 1U ACX has only DC
> power-supplier.
This was my feeling
On 20/12/2012, at 4:58 PM, Michel de Nostredame wrote:
> Possibly Juniper is positioning ACX for that?
> But ACX has far lower port density and those
> 1U ACX has only DC power-supplier.
This was my feeling too, but there is *currently* no VPLS support on ACX. I'm
hoping that will change in
Possibly Juniper is positioning ACX for that?
But ACX has far lower port density and those
1U ACX has only DC power-supplier.
--
Michel~
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Mark Tees wrote:
> Can't help but wonder what they were thinking with that design.
>
> How many people out there want this fu
On (2012-12-20 17:32 +1100), Mark Tees wrote:
> Can't help but wonder what they were thinking with that design.
EX is all COTS. I believe that MPLS not was design goal for EX3200/4200 so
by the time someone figured out they want to offer MPLS too, it was too
late in the game to change chip and th
Can't help but wonder what they were thinking with that design.
How many people out there want this functionality in a 1RU box?
On 20/12/2012, at 1:00 PM, Tim Jackson wrote:
> It can't even pass packets with > 1 label.
>
> --
> Tim
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Mark Tees wrote:
> Wo
It can't even pass packets with > 1 label.
--
Tim
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Mark Tees wrote:
> Would it be feasible still for only outer label operations?
>
> To use as P router would you only ever need to work with outer label?
>
> Sent from some sort of iDevice.
>
> On 20/12/2012, at
Would it be feasible still for only outer label operations?
To use as P router would you only ever need to work with outer label?
Sent from some sort of iDevice.
On 20/12/2012, at 9:52 AM, Craig Askings wrote:
> On 19 December 2012 20:18, Mark Tees wrote:
>
>> Hi list.
>>
>> Has anyone hear
On 19 December 2012 20:18, Mark Tees wrote:
> Hi list.
>
> Has anyone heard about if there is ever going to be support for LDP on the
> ex4200/3200 series?
>
>From what I understand the chipset on ex4200/3200 does not support more
than one mpls label, so LDP etc is not possible on that hardware.
2012 9:19 PM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] LDP on ex4200/3200 seriesand 1RU LSR?
Hi list.
Has anyone heard about if there is ever going to be support for LDP on
the ex4200/3200 series?
Also, has anyone heard if Juniper is planning a 1RU switch (24-48 GigE +
a few 10GBE ports
Hi list.
Has anyone heard about if there is ever going to be support for LDP on the
ex4200/3200 series?
Also, has anyone heard if Juniper is planning a 1RU switch (24-48 GigE + a few
10GBE ports) that has full MPLS support?
I noticed that the ex4500/4550 has full MPLS capability according to
13 matches
Mail list logo
