Re: [j-nsp] MC-LAG on QFX5100

McLendon <wimcl...@gmail.com>; Vincent Bernat <ber...@luffy.cx> Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MC-LAG on QFX5100 We are running VRRP in all VLANS that require L3. We also have the static ARP entries setup so they can ping between peers. We have floating stat

Re: [j-nsp] MC-LAG on QFX5100

We are running VRRP in all VLANS that require L3. We also have the static ARP entries setup so they can ping between peers. We have floating static routes so that if a MC-LAG peer loses its upstream routing, it will forward all traffic to the other MC-LAG peer over the ICL. **if we don’t do this

Re: [j-nsp] MC-LAG on QFX5100

I can’t remember the exact version offhand. it was in the 14.1X53 range I believe. It’s been live for a while though. I think we may have run into issues with some MC-LAG on ex4600s (mostly the same as qfx5100…) in the 14.1X53-D30 range maybe? I think they were resolved with D35? I’m sorry

Re: [j-nsp] MC-LAG on QFX5100

❦ 10 juillet 2017 12:36 -0400, William McLendon  : > if you are running a routing protocol over the particular VLAN on the > MC-LAG peers (which is a supported config in Junos MC-LAG > implementation) make sure you are running VRRP between the MC-LAG > peers, even though it

Re: [j-nsp] MC-LAG on QFX5100

if you are running a routing protocol over the particular VLAN on the MC-LAG peers (which is a supported config in Junos MC-LAG implementation) make sure you are running VRRP between the MC-LAG peers, even though it seems unnecessary. VRRP seems required for any ARP sync to occur for a given

Re: [j-nsp] MC-LAG on QFX5100

I haven't done MC-LAG but I'm curious about your mention of arp synch not working. How do you know ? Are you missing arp entries in one 5100 but not the other ? or what are you seeing (not seeing) ? - Aaron ___ juniper-nsp mailing list

Re: [j-nsp] MC-LAG on QFX5100

ber...@luffy.cx> Cc: Juniper List <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Jackson, William <william.jack...@gibtele.com> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MC-LAG on QFX5100 Is there something preventing you from using VCF or qfabric? On Jul 9, 2017 7:25 AM, "Vincent Bernat" <ber...@luffy.cx

Re: [j-nsp] MC-LAG on QFX5100

Is there something preventing you from using VCF or qfabric? On Jul 9, 2017 7:25 AM, "Vincent Bernat" wrote: > ❦ 9 juillet 2017 09:07 GMT, "Jackson, William" < > william.jack...@gibtele.com> : > > > We have been testing an MC-LAG active/active setup on qfx5100 using the >

Re: [j-nsp] MC-LAG on QFX5100

❦ 9 juillet 2017 09:07 GMT, "Jackson, William"  : > We have been testing an MC-LAG active/active setup on qfx5100 using the > latest 14.1x53 code. > We are seeing issues when using L3 in the MC-LAG. > We are using IRB with VRRP on a number of vlans that face the

[j-nsp] MC-LAG on QFX5100

Hi We have been testing an MC-LAG active/active setup on qfx5100 using the latest 14.1x53 code. We are seeing issues when using L3 in the MC-LAG. We are using IRB with VRRP on a number of vlans that face the downstream client. It seems that in active/active both nodes process traffic even if