Re: [j-nsp] MX-Series JUNOS Version

2010-02-05 Thread Johannes Resch
On Thu, February 4, 2010 18:42, Eric Van Tol wrote: > Hi all, > We just took shipment of some MX960s and MX240s for a much needed network > upgrade. They came shipped with 10.0R2.10. This seems to be the latest > and greatest version of JUNOS. The question is, is anyone currently > running it an

Re: [j-nsp] MX-Series JUNOS Version

2010-02-05 Thread martin.mogensen
>Do you know if the list of E-EOL or recommended JUNOS versions for the >MX is published somewhere, by any chance? I've not been able to find >any info about it on Juniper's web site (the closest I've seen is the >article that states which versions are recommended for EX-, J-, and >SRX-series). T

Re: [j-nsp] MX-Series JUNOS Version

2010-02-05 Thread Tore Anderson
* Mark Tinka > > The world is well again, if your choice of JUNOS gets the E- > EOL sticker :-). > Do you know if the list of E-EOL or recommended JUNOS versions for the MX is published somewhere, by any chance? I've not been able to find any info about it on Juniper's web site (the closest I'

Re: [j-nsp] MX-Series JUNOS Version

2010-02-05 Thread Eric Van Tol
> -Original Message- > From: Richard A Steenbergen [mailto:r...@e-gerbil.net] > Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 2:21 PM > To: Eric Van Tol > Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX-Series JUNOS Version > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 12:42:29PM -

Re: [j-nsp] MX-Series JUNOS Version

2010-02-04 Thread Mark Tinka
On Friday 05 February 2010 03:31:39 am Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > Of course > you can't assume that just because it is an R4 that it > will be stable, since any new issues which come in after > that just get moved to being dealt with in future > versions (where there are all new bugs!), a

Re: [j-nsp] MX-Series JUNOS Version

2010-02-04 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 02:18:24AM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote: > We generally try to stay away from anything pre-R3 or R4 > (depending on the history of R1 and R2). I haven't had a > chance to try JUNOS 9.6 or 10.0, but this is mostly > influenced by how terrible 9.x has been, and we're done > "ch

Re: [j-nsp] MX-Series JUNOS Version

2010-02-04 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 12:42:29PM -0500, Eric Van Tol wrote: > Hi all, > We just took shipment of some MX960s and MX240s for a much needed > network upgrade. They came shipped with 10.0R2.10. This seems to be > the latest and greatest version of JUNOS. The question is, is anyone > currently run

Re: [j-nsp] MX-Series JUNOS Version

2010-02-04 Thread Mark Tinka
On Friday 05 February 2010 01:42:29 am Eric Van Tol wrote: > Hi all, > We just took shipment of some MX960s and MX240s for a > much needed network upgrade. They came shipped with > 10.0R2.10. This seems to be the latest and greatest > version of JUNOS. The question is, is anyone currently >

[j-nsp] MX-Series JUNOS Version

2010-02-04 Thread Eric Van Tol
Hi all, We just took shipment of some MX960s and MX240s for a much needed network upgrade. They came shipped with 10.0R2.10. This seems to be the latest and greatest version of JUNOS. The question is, is anyone currently running it and is it "stable"? Any serious bugs I should be aware of th