Another use case is for DPI or other transparent devices when your traffic
is not symmetrical (more downstream than upstream )
you are installing the DPI between two vrf on the same router and use
switch as port extender
This way you are using less ports on the router for almost the same amount
of
On 06/04/13 03:59, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
> No, this is not possible (and why would you need it?). If you think
> about this for a moment, it would require the ability to have 16k or
> so MAC addresses per physical interface. Highly unrealistic.
I can think of one common case, many IX's and shar
On (2013-04-05 18:59 +0200), sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
> No, this is not possible (and why would you need it?). If you think
> about this for a moment, it would require the ability to have 16k or
> so MAC addresses per physical interface. Highly unrealistic.
This is interesting question. The impli
> I've tried to find a solution but I'm afraid I've reached a dead-end : Is
> it possible to fix the MAC address on a aggregated interface PER UNIT? The
> "mac" command is available at interfaces level, not unit.
> JunOS version is 11.4
No, this is not possible (and why would you need it?). If you
Hello all,
I've tried to find a solution but I'm afraid I've reached a dead-end : Is
it possible to fix the MAC address on a aggregated interface PER UNIT? The
"mac" command is available at interfaces level, not unit.
JunOS version is 11.4
Regards,
Bastien
_
5 matches
Mail list logo