Hi All
Thank you for your support, most probably what we are gonna do is:
- try turning GRES/NSR on/off
- upgrade to 10.4R8.5 or 10.4R9
Currently we are waiting JTAC response.
I'll let you once it is solved.
Thank you again
Mohammad Salbad
-Original Message-
From: Stefan
We have an MX960 with two routing engines, Re0: Backup, Re1: Master
When we try to switchover to the backup RE we see the following message:
XXX# run request chassis routing-engine master switch
error: Standby Routing Engine is not ready for graceful switchover
(replication_err
You have GRES enabled and the backup RE was not ready to takeover. See
the message in the first lines.
Thanks
On 2/15/12, Mohammad masal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone
We have an MX960 with two routing engines, Re0: Backup, Re1: Master
When we try to switchover to the backup RE we see
Kindly find the following output, I hope it is helpful
x show task replication
Stateful Replication: Enabled
RE mode: Master
ProtocolSynchronization Status
OSPFComplete
BGP Complete
the
correct outputs, I agree with the recommendation to turn GRES/NSR on/off. If
that doesn't work, reboot REs.
Serge
From: Mohammad masal...@gmail.com
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 6:44:42 AM
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX960 Redundant
Morgan,
You are correct if you are running GRES only, however if you enable NSR
basically the Backup RE also actively runs rpd and maintains state adjacencies,
etc, so in the event of a Primary RE failure you will not need to reestablish
adjacencies, etc.
The cool thing is the Backup RE is
On 2/15/12 10:56 , Daniel Roesen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:24:50PM -0500, Stefan Fouant wrote:
The cool thing is the Backup RE is actually listening to all the
control plane messages coming on fxp1 destined for the Master RE
and formulating it's own decisions, running its own Dijkstra,
I was referring more to a bug in hardware... Bad memory, etc.
Stefan Fouant
JNCIE-SEC, JNCIE-SP, JNCIE-ER, JNCI
Technical Trainer, Juniper Networks
Follow us on Twitter @JuniperEducate
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 15, 2012, at 1:56 PM, Daniel Roesen d...@cluenet.de wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at
Hi everyone
We have an MX960 with two routing engines, Re0: Backup, Re1: Master
When we try to switchover to the backup RE we see the following message:
XXX# run request chassis routing-engine master switch
error: Standby Routing Engine is not ready for graceful switchover
Correct me if I'm wrong, but backup routing engines never have adjacencies
or peering relationships etc because they are not active, correct? When
they become master they have to reestablish those sessions. Thats how it
seems to be for our SRX routing engines, at least, but routes are shared
10 matches
Mail list logo
