Re: [j-nsp] Mixed vcf question

ards > > alexander > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] Im Auftrag von > james list > Gesendet: Samstag, 23. Januar 2016 07:25 > An: William Johansson > Cc: Juniper List > Betreff: Re: [j-nsp] M

Re: [j-nsp] Mixed vcf question

Hello The scalability levels and features in a mixed mode vcf (for all switches that are part of the vcf) will be lowered to the levels of the lowest switch model. This means that the numbers of ae's, mac address table size, routing tables size, cos features etc for the whole vcf will (in your

Re: [j-nsp] Mixed vcf question

Hi William For example for the layer3 (max routes supported, etc) why not the one of the QFX5100 acting as routing engine (and spine)? Is there something stated on the juniper.net site? Cheers James Il 23/Gen/2016 00:32, "William Johansson" ha scritto: > Hello >

Re: [j-nsp] Mixed vcf question

r-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] Im Auftrag von james list Gesendet: Samstag, 23. Januar 2016 07:25 An: William Johansson Cc: Juniper List Betreff: Re: [j-nsp] Mixed vcf question Hi William For example for the layer3 (max routes supported, etc) why not the one of the QFX5100 acting as routing engine

[j-nsp] Mixed vcf question

Hello experts, a question regarding a mixed VCF environment with QFX5100 as spine and QFX5100/EX4300 as leaf. My customer question is: what are the Layer2/Layer3 maximum performance expected to be reached in a mixed environment ? The one reached by QFX5100 or the one reached by EX4300 or