Re: [j-nsp] NSR, multicast, and VRFs?

2008-05-05 Thread Mark Tinka
On Tuesday 06 May 2008, Dave Diller wrote: > So, in other words, I've got TWO reasons I can't use > NSR... and thereby ISSU. Boo. Same reasons here... NSR looked interesting on paper until these caveats became apparent. But then again, ISSU (which requires NSR; go figure) is currently only sup

Re: [j-nsp] NSR, multicast, and VRFs?

2008-05-05 Thread Dave Diller
> On May 5, 2008, at 1:14 PM, Pekka Savola wrote: >> Now, 9.1 says: >> >> Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), for unicast IPv4 and IPv6 address >> families only. If you configure any other address family, the BGP >> session will not come up on the backup router. > > This text is probably inaccurate. A

Re: [j-nsp] NSR, multicast, and VRFs?

2008-05-05 Thread Stefan Fouant
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Dave Diller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now, 9.1 says: > > Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), for unicast IPv4 and IPv6 address > families only. If you configure any other address family, the BGP > session will not come up on the backup router. > > which seems to say,

Re: [j-nsp] NSR, multicast, and VRFs?

2008-05-05 Thread Pekka Savola
On Mon, 5 May 2008, Dave Diller wrote: > Nonstop routing is supported for the following protocols: > * Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) ... > Now, 9.1 says: > > Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), for unicast IPv4 and IPv6 address > families only. If you configure any other address family, the BGP > se

[j-nsp] NSR, multicast, and VRFs?

2008-05-05 Thread Dave Diller
OK, the High Availability docs aren't terribly clear. Does anyone know if I can use NSR with both multicast and L3 VPNs? 8.4/8.5 HA doc simply says: Nonstop routing is supported for the following protocols: * Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) 9.0 says: Nonstop active routing is supported f