Re: [j-nsp] OSPF next hop

2012-07-24 Thread Aaron Dewell
On Jul 24, 2012, at 2:04 PM, Wayne Tucker wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Aaron Dewell wrote: >> Yes, Type Transit (2). However, the Network LSA only includes 3 attached >> routers (should be 6 currently). There are two Network LSAs in R7. One has >> the interface IP of R1 (non-DR

Re: [j-nsp] OSPF next hop

2012-07-24 Thread Wayne Tucker
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Aaron Dewell wrote: > Yes, Type Transit (2). However, the Network LSA only includes 3 attached > routers (should be 6 currently). There are two Network LSAs in R7. One has > the interface IP of R1 (non-DR/BDR) with 3 attached routers (R1, R5, R6). > The oth

Re: [j-nsp] OSPF next hop

2012-07-24 Thread Aaron Dewell
On Jul 24, 2012, at 4:56 AM, Wayne Tucker wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Aaron Dewell wrote: >> I ran into an odd behavior here tonight, I'm hoping someone has some ideas. >> We have 8 routers on a broadcast OSPF segment. All are advertising their >> loopback addresses (amongst o

Re: [j-nsp] OSPF next hop

2012-07-24 Thread Wayne Tucker
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Aaron Dewell wrote: > I ran into an odd behavior here tonight, I'm hoping someone has some ideas. > We have 8 routers on a broadcast OSPF segment. All are advertising their > loopback addresses (amongst other things). I'll call this R1 to R8 for now. > Thei

[j-nsp] OSPF next hop

2012-07-23 Thread Aaron Dewell
Hi all, I ran into an odd behavior here tonight, I'm hoping someone has some ideas. We have 8 routers on a broadcast OSPF segment. All are advertising their loopback addresses (amongst other things). I'll call this R1 to R8 for now. Their IP addresses on this shared segment are 192.168.0.1