Re: [j-nsp] R: Re: QinQ interface configuration question

2014-07-21 Thread Saku Ytti
On (2014-07-21 00:16 -0700), Robert J Huey wrote: > I've seen this sort of a thing done on other platforms. The most you can > expect it to put the more specific match up front ( unit 1 } outer 555 inner > 200 } ) followed by less specifics towards the end ( unit 20 { outer 555 } ). > I've

Re: [j-nsp] R: Re: QinQ interface configuration question

2014-07-21 Thread Robert J Huey
I've seen this sort of a thing done on other platforms. The most you can expect it to put the more specific match up front ( unit 1 } outer 555 inner 200 } ) followed by less specifics towards the end ( unit 20 { outer 555 } ). But I'm guessing here, I've not seen this done and in principal

[j-nsp] R: Re: QinQ interface configuration question

2014-07-20 Thread dim0sal
Yes, this is the point why it doesn't work. Tks Sent with MobileĀ  Messaggio originale Da: Edward Dore Data: A: dim0sal Cc: sth...@nethelp.no,juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Oggetto: Re: [j-nsp] QinQ interface configuration question How does the device know which unit on

Re: [j-nsp] R: Re: QinQ interface configuration question

2014-07-20 Thread sthaug
> I meant having two subinterfaces with the four prospected scenarios. Right, I believe that is what I replied. So let's do them once more and see if it answers your questions. If not, you need to clarify further. Interface ge-0/0/0 used as an example. 1) different SVLAN and CVLAN interface ge-0

[j-nsp] R: Re: QinQ interface configuration question

2014-07-20 Thread dim0sal
I meant having two subinterfaces with the four prospected scenarios. Tks Messaggio originale Da: sth...@nethelp.no Data: A: dim0...@hotmail.com Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Oggetto: Re: [j-nsp] QinQ interface configuration question > I'm wondering if under a QinQ