Re: [j-nsp] RPD event M20

Thanks, we're going to try these steps out and I will let you know. El 05/05/2010 4:30, Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim escribió: without studying your topology in detail, i think the best reason that can be explained by your rtsockmon output is there is spurious routing updates in your topology. these

Re: [j-nsp] RPD event M20

Hi, In this router, we have configured 2 logical router. In the 'physical' we have only one provider (one full-routing) and in the logical one we are connected to 2 providers (2 full-routing). Are these events for both logical routers? They are differents providers, why should I configure alw

Re: [j-nsp] RPD event M20

Looks like there's a persistent oscillation in your routing topology. If you see routes i.e. 195.240.208.0 that comes from different peer ASes, you might want to configure always-compare-med in your bgp path-selection statement. By default, it will only compare routes that come from the same peer A

Re: [j-nsp] RPD event M20

Hello, I've just executed this comand on the shell and it appeared a lot of routes: r...@eg01% rtsockmon -t rpd sender flagtype op [17:30:29] rpd Proute add inet6 2401:ee00:: tid=2 plen=32 type=user flags=0x10 nh=indr nhflags=0x4 nhidx=262144 filtidx=0 [17:

[j-nsp] RPD event M20

Hello there, This message has appeared in the log of our M20. It is not the first time it occurs and we are quite worried. The average CPU consumption is 4% and just at the time the message appeared on the log, we found increases up to 100% and an increase in temperature of 6 º in the routing