Re: [j-nsp] rate limiting per-user prefix lists

2019-01-15 Thread Niall Donaghy
January 2019 17:59 To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] rate limiting per-user prefix lists On 1/9/19 6:14 AM, Niall Donaghy wrote: > Hi Mike, > > I can give you a few hints: > > DPCE will perform poorly, depending on how many policers you > instantiate. >

Re: [j-nsp] rate limiting per-user prefix lists

2019-01-14 Thread mike+j...@willitsonline.com
On 1/9/19 6:14 AM, Niall Donaghy wrote: > Hi Mike, > > I can give you a few hints: > > DPCE will perform poorly, depending on how many policers you > instantiate. > (hint: 10K will kill it, and hint: policers will not be accurate). > MPCs will perform better but don't burden more

Re: [j-nsp] rate limiting per-user prefix lists

2019-01-14 Thread mike+jnsp
On 1/9/19 7:37 AM, Alexander Arseniev via juniper-nsp wrote: > Hello, > > Well, the prefix-action policers would likely relieve congestion on > Your backhaul MW links but the 100Mbps "last mile" will still be > congested, with a mix of good and bad packets. > > And I would say more bad than good

Re: [j-nsp] rate limiting per-user prefix lists

2019-01-09 Thread Alexander Arseniev via juniper-nsp
Hello, Well, the prefix-action policers would likely relieve congestion on Your backhaul MW links but the 100Mbps "last mile" will still be congested, with a mix of good and bad packets. And I would say more bad than good because good traffic (mainly HTTPS nowadays) will do TCP backoff at

Re: [j-nsp] rate limiting per-user prefix lists

2019-01-09 Thread Niall Donaghy
: 08 January 2019 18:58 To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] rate limiting per-user prefix lists Hi, My platform is Juniper mx240 running 15.1R6.7 and I'm interested in using prefix-action to establish rate limits per user in my network. DDOS attacks targeting single users

[j-nsp] rate limiting per-user prefix lists

2019-01-08 Thread mike+jnsp
Hi,     My platform is Juniper mx240 running 15.1R6.7 and I'm interested in using prefix-action to establish rate limits per user in my network.     DDOS attacks targeting single users on my network can frequently affect many users who happen to share the same backhaul connectivity such as to

Re: [j-nsp] Rate limiting v4 and v6 together

2011-06-03 Thread Mark Tinka
On Friday, June 03, 2011 02:05:45 AM Chris Adams wrote: Everybody suggested putting the policer directly on the interface and setting logical-interface-policer in the policer. Watch out if you're running Junos 9.3R2.8 (earlier code could also be affected, not certain). Implementing the

Re: [j-nsp] Rate limiting v4 and v6 together

2011-06-02 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net said: I'm currently using interface, policer, and filter config like this to rate-limit ethernet interfaces to paid bandwidth on an M10i: I got responses from several people along the same lines, but I figured I'd summarize my solution for the

[j-nsp] rate limiting on the EX

2009-05-21 Thread junos fordummies
Hello peeps. I have an EX switch (4200) with a 10Mb LES circuit to the Internet. I have 5 customers who I need to guarantee 1Mb each (http) and the remainder 5 Mb they can contend for as Burst or BE traffic. Any ideas how I can achieve this result ? TIA. JfD.

Re: [j-nsp] rate limiting on the EX

2009-05-21 Thread Dan Ho
Here is how I would do it: [edit class-of-service] forwarding-classes { class Cust-1 queue-num 7; class Cust-2 queue-num 6; class Cust-3 queue-num 5; class Cust-4 queue-num 4; class Cust-5 queue-num 3; class BE queue-num 0; } interfaces { ge-UPLINK {

Re: [j-nsp] Rate limiting

2008-12-27 Thread Paolo Autore
Of Timur Ibragimov Sent: Friday, December 26, 2008 9:40 AM To: Tom Storey Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Rate limiting Tom Storey wrote: A burst size of 1.5kbps as you have configured in your example only allows traffic to increase at 1.5 kilobits each second, not a hell

Re: [j-nsp] Rate limiting

2008-12-27 Thread Pavel Lunin
Hi Timur, 2008/12/26 Timur Ibragimov i...@ycc.ru Tom Storey wrote: A burst size of 1.5kbps as you have configured in your example only allows traffic to increase at 1.5 kilobits each second, not a hell of a lot. At that rate it would take upto 1000 seconds, i.e. 16 minutes to reach the

Re: [j-nsp] Rate limiting

2008-12-27 Thread Pavel Lunin
P. S. BS is needed because dealing with policing (not shaping), the router has no buffer where to put a packet in for awaiting. It is also not able to drop a part of a packet -- either transmit or drop a whole one. Well, imagine a situation when you need to transmit just one packet per hour, but

Re: [j-nsp] Rate limiting

2008-12-26 Thread Tom Storey
Hello, I have configured following policer policer bw-1500k.5ms { if-exceeding { bandwidth-limit 150; burst-size-limit 1500; } then discard; } believing it will rate limit traffic to 1500 Kbps. But it starts to drop packets at much less than configured

Re: [j-nsp] Rate limiting

2008-12-26 Thread Timur Ibragimov
Tom Storey wrote: A burst size of 1.5kbps as you have configured in your example only allows traffic to increase at 1.5 kilobits each second, not a hell of a lot. At that rate it would take upto 1000 seconds, i.e. 16 minutes to reach the full 1.5 megabits you are wanting to supply... I

[j-nsp] Rate limiting

2008-12-25 Thread Timur Ibragimov
Hello, I have configured following policer policer bw-1500k.5ms { if-exceeding { bandwidth-limit 150; burst-size-limit 1500; } then discard; } believing it will rate limit traffic to 1500 Kbps. But it starts to drop packets at much less than

[j-nsp] rate limiting per vlan in a gigabit ethernet Interface

2007-04-26 Thread Jose Sanchez
Hi, Does anybody know if I can rate limit (ingress and egress) per VLAN in a Gigabit Ethernet Interface. Thank you Best regards Jose Sanchez ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net