Den 01.02.2012 08:26, skrev sth...@nethelp.no:
Yup.. our hindsight would have been to continue deploying
E/ERX ;)
While we don't use those, I certainly agree that they sound
like a much better option from Juniper than the MX.
The Juniper ERX/E-series has its own series of challenges. They have
; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Recommended Releases now posted for MX, M, T, QFX -
Update!
> > Yup.. our hindsight would have been to continue deploying E/ERX ;)
>
> While we don't use those, I certainly agree that they sound like a
> much better option from
> > Yup.. our hindsight would have been to continue deploying
> > E/ERX ;)
>
> While we don't use those, I certainly agree that they sound
> like a much better option from Juniper than the MX.
The Juniper ERX/E-series has its own series of challenges. They have
a *lot* of BRAS functionality whic
On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 06:52:19 PM Paul Stewart wrote:
> Yup.. our hindsight would have been to continue deploying
> E/ERX ;)
While we don't use those, I certainly agree that they sound
like a much better option from Juniper than the MX.
Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digita
d Releases now posted for MX, M, T, QFX -
Update!
On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 06:26:44 PM Mark Tinka wrote:
> The MX is nowhere near ready to run as BRAS. But like you, we decided
> to migrate to it, so we have no choice but to run bleeding edge Junos
> 11.4R1 as well, just to g
On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 06:26:44 PM Mark Tinka wrote:
> The MX is nowhere near ready to run as BRAS. But like
> you, we decided to migrate to it, so we have no choice
> but to run bleeding edge Junos 11.4R1 as well, just to
> get basic things the outgoing Redback is able to do, as
> well as s
On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 06:12:02 PM Paul Stewart wrote:
> One incredible frustration we're going through lately on
> the MX boxes is the BRAS function as Mark mentioned
> briefly . we're up to "bleeding edge" code now
> (11.4R1.14) just to get what we consider typical
> features of a BRAS
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 3:05 AM
To: James Jones
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Recommended Releases now posted for MX, M, T, QFX
On Tues
On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 12:32:26 AM James Jones wrote:
> I am just curious what issues you guys are having with
> the junos releases?
Run through the archives to get a feel for what issues folk
are facing. And these are just the issues that folk have
decided to share.
There are others tha
that only took...about 5 years ? sweet, juniperdude.
Chris Kawchuk [juniperd...@gmail.com] wrote:
> Just noticed this today - Seems JNPR has filled out the recommended release
> JunOS matrix for all the products now (incl M, T, MX, QFX)
>
> http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=
I am just curious what issues you guys are having with the junos releases? I am
currently not having issues with any of my Juniper kit. It would be interesting
to understand the use cases in which you are seeing issues.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 30, 2012, at 6:39 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
> On M
On Monday, January 30, 2012 07:31:39 PM Derick Winkworth
wrote:
> R9 will be good... we hope.
That's what we always say starting from R4, and yet here we
are... again :-).
Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
__
/
From: Paul Stewart
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 5:12 AM
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Recommended Releases now posted for MX, M, T, QFX
Hey Chris yeah, that just showed up about 2 weeks ago (at least that's
when I notic
--Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Chris Kawchuk
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 3:54 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] Recommended Releases now posted for MX, M, T, QFX
Just noticed this today -
Just noticed this today - Seems JNPR has filled out the recommended release
JunOS matrix for all the products now (incl M, T, MX, QFX)
http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB21476
- Chris.
... Riding the 10.4 MX Release Train. Next Stop, R9.
15 matches
Mail list logo
