Re: [j-nsp] S-NAT-IN-MX5-MX10

2014-01-09 Thread Tore Anderson
* Mark Tinka > Not to my knowledge, no (well, not in 2014 anyway). N:1 NAT > is what makes sense. FWIW, I've been working on a 1:1 (IPv4:IPv6) NAT solution that I believe make a lot of sense in 2014 and beyond: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-anderson-siit-dc-00 http://www.ipspace.net/IPv6-O

Re: [j-nsp] S-NAT-IN-MX5-MX10

2014-01-09 Thread Mark Tinka
On Thursday, January 09, 2014 11:32:07 AM Tore Anderson wrote: > FWIW, I've been working on a 1:1 (IPv4:IPv6) NAT solution > that I believe make a lot of sense in 2014 and beyond: > > http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-anderson-siit-dc-00 > http://www.ipspace.net/IPv6-Only_Data_Centers Well, NA

Re: [j-nsp] S-NAT-IN-MX5-MX10

2014-01-09 Thread Mark Tinka
On Thursday, January 09, 2014 10:31:34 AM Skeeve Stevens wrote: > Anyone got any deployment examples which would make this > license worth while? Not to my knowledge, no (well, not in 2014 anyway). N:1 NAT is what makes sense. Back in 200, an ISP I know of was offering 1:1 NAT on their servic

Re: [j-nsp] S-NAT-IN-MX5-MX10

2014-01-09 Thread Skeeve Stevens
-1, JAA-NAT-10 > or JAA-NAT-100. > > Cheers, > Caillin > > -Original Message- > From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf > Of Mark Tinka > Sent: Thursday, 9 January 2014 3:52 PM > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [

Re: [j-nsp] S-NAT-IN-MX5-MX10

2014-01-08 Thread Caillin Bathern
s, Caillin -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka Sent: Thursday, 9 January 2014 3:52 PM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] S-NAT-IN-MX5-MX10 On Thursday, January 09, 2014 03:49:29 AM Skeeve Stevens wrote: >

Re: [j-nsp] S-NAT-IN-MX5-MX10

2014-01-08 Thread Mark Tinka
On Thursday, January 09, 2014 03:49:29 AM Skeeve Stevens wrote: > I wonder if anyone knows more about this license. > S-NAT-IN-MX5-MX10 > > The description says: "INLINE NAT SOFTWARE LICENSE - IT > ALLOWS TO RUN NAT FEATURES ON A MX5 OR MX10." > > But I am not sure what that really means. Is i

[j-nsp] S-NAT-IN-MX5-MX10

2014-01-08 Thread Skeeve Stevens
Hey all, I wonder if anyone knows more about this license. S-NAT-IN-MX5-MX10 The description says: "INLINE NAT SOFTWARE LICENSE - IT ALLOWS TO RUN NAT FEATURES ON A MX5 OR MX10." But I am not sure what that really means. Is it for LSN/CGN? Is it needed on top of the service card? Thanks all.