Re: [j-nsp] SRX MPLS

2012-08-23 Thread Johan Borch
I saw the following exceptions for SRX-series: VPLS multihoming, which allows connecting a CE device to multiple PE routers to provide redundant connectivity, is not supported on J Series or SRX Series devices I'm going to have two SRX's on each site and using vrrp between them, will I hit this

Re: [j-nsp] SRX MPLS

2012-08-23 Thread Chris Kawchuk
Err VPLS Implies Layer 2 only. Where is the VRP runninng in-between? Are you doing vlan-id inside the VPLS instance for normalization, then binding an irb.x into it? I dont think that works in SRX/J either. (l3 within VPLS). - CK. On 2012-08-23, at 6:39 PM, Johan Borch wrote: VPLS

Re: [j-nsp] SRX MPLS

2012-08-23 Thread Johan Borch
Your'e right of course :) My question was more how the VPLS multihoming will affect this setup. Regards Johan On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Chris Kawchuk juniperd...@gmail.comwrote: Err VPLS Implies Layer 2 only. Where is the VRP runninng in-between? Are you doing vlan-id inside the

Re: [j-nsp] SRX MPLS

2012-08-23 Thread Chris Kawchuk
Shouldn't affect it in the classical BGP active./backup sense; only 1 'vrf' is active in a multi-homing BGP setup. However, since the SRX/J doesn't do that, both will end up being active - You'll need a way to suppress one of them from getting any traffic. Perhaps think about using an EX4200

[j-nsp] SRX MPLS

2012-08-15 Thread Johan Borch
Hi, I have a design question regarding MPLS. I'm planning to create a MPLS rings with 4-8 SRX240 devices in packet mode and the main purpose is L3VPN/VPLS p1-p2-p3-p4-p5-p1 (p5 connects back to p1) My budget is low for this and the srx240 is cheap, we will push max 1Gbps. For example in some

Re: [j-nsp] SRX MPLS

2012-08-15 Thread Phil Mayers
On 15/08/12 15:29, Johan Borch wrote: Hi, I have a design question regarding MPLS. I'm planning to create a MPLS rings with 4-8 SRX240 devices in packet mode and the main purpose is L3VPN/VPLS p1-p2-p3-p4-p5-p1 (p5 connects back to p1) My budget is low for this and the srx240 is cheap, we

Re: [j-nsp] SRX MPLS

2012-08-15 Thread GIULIANO (WZTECH)
Phill, Could ou please share some juniper links or configurations on how about to configure SRX boxes with MPLS in a RING topology ? Are you using L3 MPLS VPN or L2 VPLS or EoMPLS ? Is it possible to share some configurations or links ? Thanks a lot, Giuliano On 15/08/12 15:29, Johan

Re: [j-nsp] SRX MPLS

2012-08-15 Thread Phil Mayers
On 15/08/12 16:50, GIULIANO (WZTECH) wrote: Phill, Could ou please share some juniper links or configurations on how about to configure SRX boxes with MPLS in a RING topology ? Sure. I'm assuming you have a basic Juniper layer3 provider core configured. In particular, you'll want an IGP

Re: [j-nsp] SRX MPLS

2012-08-15 Thread Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim
Johan, You might want to know that VRRPv6 isn't supported on the branch SRX so if you need IPv6 resiliency, you're out of luck. If you need both v4 and v6 node resiliency, the only way to do it now is clustering which is a whole different beast altogether. On Aug 15, 2012, at 10:29 PM, Johan