Thursday, November 07, 2013 7:05 AM
To: Mike Devlin
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX cluster and VC Lags
Since your Primary SRX-firewall will be connecting with the switch through
6 interfaces hence the load balancing will done over this aggregate interface ,
perhaps per packet
Since your Primary SRX-firewall will be connecting with the switch through
6 interfaces hence the load balancing will done over this aggregate
interface , perhaps per packet level by default. The other 6 interface of
the other (secondary) firewall will be disabled in your A/P design.
Muhammad Faha
is the load distribution going to be in some fashion even on 12 interfaces?
Or even 6? Cisco i know has funky load-balancing across aggregated links
if its not 2, 4 or 8 interfaces. Is Junipers load-balancing going to be
any different/better?
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 4:19 AM, Fahad Khan wrote:
Yeah , you can do soYou don't need any explicit configuration on SRX
Side, while you would need to enable LACP on Switch port level.
All the 6 interfaces/Firewall will participate in one reth interface and
then you can enable vlan-tagging to provision inter-vlan routing. You will
be having int
Dear experts, I have query regarding SRX (650)cluster lag between and ex-4550
virtual chassis. I have 6 physical link from each member VC to wards each node
in the srx cluster . I have multiple vlans in ex switch and planing to host
the L3 interface in srx cluster . Now the question is can i bu
5 matches
Mail list logo
