Hi,
I am trying to use SRX240B as a VLAN capable switch and also VPLS
endpoint. VPLS works "well" for me with standard routed port, but when i
tried to use uplink port as a "switch port" and use RVI (routed vlan
interface) to connect to MPLS core, VPLS stop working: OSPF, BGP and
RSVP works well,
...@gmail.com
Cc: 'juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net' juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX for MPLS
Message-ID:
33e45efc4b29ee4195b9440b22f885ea584a8...@embx02-bng.jnpr.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Sorry for the confusion. The top end SRX don't yet support
-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Miroslav Georgiev
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 10:05 AM
To: Will McLendon
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX for MPLS
Unfortunately there are some vpls limitations on SRX and J-series
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Chris Evans chrisccnpsp...@gmail.comwrote:
My question is what is the purpose of using a security device for pure
routing purposes??? Why not just buy a router?
It seems like the point was for it to be both a router and a security
device. They can boast
you can definitely do MPLS on J-series and SRX gateways. It even says so on
the datasheet -- however, as was mentioned, you must put the device in
packet-based mode, and thus lose ALL security features (everything that is
configured under [edit security] -- so Zones, Stateful Policies, NAT,
My question is what is the purpose of using a security device for pure
routing purposes??? Why not just buy a router?
On Oct 22, 2010 9:34 AM, Will McLendon wimcl...@gmail.com wrote:
you can definitely do MPLS on J-series and SRX gateways. It even says so
on the datasheet -- however, as was
Unfortunately there are some vpls limitations on SRX and J-series
routers. You should check them first.
Besides that everything works.
On 10/22/2010 04:28 PM, Will McLendon wrote:
you can definitely do MPLS on J-series and SRX gateways. It even says so on
the datasheet -- however, as was
Simple Answer. Cost.
The SRX650 can handle about as much traffic as an M7i, at less half the price.
There's no equivalent J-series at that level. (J6350 would top out at 2Gbps).
Likewise, J-series runs virtually the same code now as the SRX series (in terms
of security),
Which begs an answer
We are studying it:
* J Series or SRX Series devices do not support aggregated Ethernet
interfaces. Therefore, aggregated Ethernet interfaces between CE
devices and PE routers are not supported for VPLS routing
instances on J Series or SRX Series devices.
* VPLS routing
We are studying it:
* J Series or SRX Series devices do not support aggregated Ethernet
interfaces. Therefore, aggregated Ethernet interfaces between CE
devices and PE routers are not supported for VPLS routing
instances on J Series or SRX Series devices.
* VPLS routing
@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX for MPLS
Unfortunately there are some vpls limitations on SRX and J-series
routers. You should check them first.
Besides that everything works.
On 10/22/2010 04:28 PM, Will McLendon wrote:
you can definitely do MPLS on J-series and SRX gateways. It even says
On 22/10/2010 11:46, Chris Evans wrote:
My question is what is the purpose of using a security device for pure
routing purposes??? Why not just buy a router?
On Oct 22, 2010 9:34 AM, Will McLendonwimcl...@gmail.com wrote:
Price and size of the box.
Ahhh the cost reason. That is a huge reason we aren't buying much juniper
gear at this point in time. We only use m or mx devices along with the full
Cisco product catalog. Every solution we are doing lately costs 2 to 5 times
using juniper versus cisco.. I just can't justify juniper at this
Now we need to understand the limits for L2 VPNs e how can we use it
integrated with JUNOS Space and Network Activator.
Ahhh the cost reason. That is a huge reason we aren't buying much
juniper gear at this point in time. We only use m or mx devices along
with the full Cisco product
People,
Does anyone uses SRX routers for MPLS (VPLS) Transport ?
We are thinking about the use of SRX220 under some conditions:
- Use it in a not a good environment without air conditioning and a lot
of dust ... external box temperature rises from 35 to 42 Celsius.
- Be the point to
People,
Does anyone uses SRX routers for MPLS (VPLS) Transport ?
We are thinking about the use of SRX220 under some conditions:
- Use it in a not a good environment without air conditioning and a lot
of dust ... external box temperature rises from 35 to 42 Celsius.
- Be the point to
Hi Giuliano,
We do not support MPLS on SRX platforms.
Thanks Regards,
Jai
- Original Message -
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Thu Oct 21 19:48:46 2010
Subject: [j-nsp
:57:52 2010
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX for MPLS
Hi Giuliano,
We do not support MPLS on SRX platforms.
Thanks Regards,
Jai
- Original Message -
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net juniper-nsp
@puck.nether.net Sent: Thu Oct 21
19:57:52 2010 Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX for MPLS Hi Giuliano, We do not support
MPLS on SRX platforms. Thanks Regards, Jai - Original Message -
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
- Original Message -
From: Jai Chandra Gundapaneni
To: 'giulian...@uol.com.br' giulian...@uol.com.br; '
juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net' juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Thu Oct 21 19:57:52 2010
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX for MPLS
Hi Giuliano,
We do not support MPLS on SRX
20 matches
Mail list logo
