On 2011-10-26, at 9:03 PM, Leigh Porter wrote:
> Does anybody have any real test results of MPLS throughput on the SRX series?
I've done some work with the SRX210 doing L2Circuits/EoMPLS (for E-LINE style
ethernet), coupled with the "new" Gig-E SFP capable mPIM. The throughput
numbers are quit
On Wednesday, October 26, 2011 06:03:56 PM Leigh Porter
wrote:
> We have been using SRX240s at the edge and in metro rings
> for some time, after teething troubles they have all
> been solid. I also have some SRX220 using MPLS over GRE
> over IP connected to the core using xDSL and this also
> wo
On 26/10/11 13:18, Mark Tinka wrote:
My concern with running this box in a production service
provider environment, particularly in Metro-E rings, is that
software stability hasn't been great based on lots of
feedback from folks on this list.
Granted that something like a ring topology might b
On 26/10/11 11:03, Leigh Porter wrote:
We have been using SRX240s at the edge and in metro rings for some
time, after teething troubles they have all been solid. I also have
some SRX220 using MPLS over GRE over IP connected to the core using
xDSL and this also works very well. We use them for LT
> >
> > In the recent thread "MPLS in the Access", someone insightfully
> pointed
> > that the low-end SRX devices run JunOS with full MPLS support, and
> are
> > way, way cheaper than the various MPLS-CPE switch-type devices that
> are
> > starting to appear.
>
> We have more than 30 of Juniper
> -Original Message-
> From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
> boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers
> Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 7:46 AM
> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [j-nsp] SRX100/2x0 as small MPLS CPE?
>
&
On 11/15/2010 07:31 PM, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
The SRX only supports traffic with a single tag. I don't think you can
provide L2 services without at least two tags.
Interesting; do you have a reference?
You *can* provide MPLS L2 services with some difficulty with just a
single
> > The SRX only supports traffic with a single tag. I don't think you can
> > provide L2 services without at least two tags.
>
> Interesting; do you have a reference?
You *can* provide MPLS L2 services with some difficulty with just a
single tag - this is what Juniper offers on the EX switch se
> On 15/11/10 15:40, Abel Alejandro wrote:
>
> >>
> >> This interests me: we have several sites on 100Mbit LES/WEES
> circuits,
> >> and I have a vision of planting on at site with:
> >>
> >>1. port 1 - MPLS /31
> >>2. port 2 - EoMPLS xconnect
> >
> > We use the SRX210 for l2circuits, VPL
On 11/15/2010 05:43 PM, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 15/11/10 14:04, Miroslav Georgiev wrote:
You will need GBe with jumbo frame. srx100 is out of the picture.
Does the SRX100 not support mini-jumbos? We successfully use MPLS
links on some 100Mbit links with ~1530 MTUs.
Link-level type: Ethernet,
On 15/11/10 15:40, Abel Alejandro wrote:
This interests me: we have several sites on 100Mbit LES/WEES circuits,
and I have a vision of planting on at site with:
1. port 1 - MPLS /31
2. port 2 - EoMPLS xconnect
We use the SRX210 for l2circuits, VPLS and VRF without issues. However
the l
On 15/11/10 15:30, Keegan Holley wrote:
The SRX only supports traffic with a single tag. I don't think you can
provide L2 services without at least two tags.
Interesting; do you have a reference?
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.
On 15/11/10 14:04, Miroslav Georgiev wrote:
You will need GBe with jumbo frame. srx100 is out of the picture.
Does the SRX100 not support mini-jumbos? We successfully use MPLS links
on some 100Mbit links with ~1530 MTUs.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 6:45 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
> In the recent thread "MPLS in the Access", someone insightfully pointed
> that the low-end SRX devices run JunOS with full MPLS support, and are way,
> way cheaper than the various MPLS-CPE switch-type devices that are starting
> to appear.
>
>
You will need GBe with jumbo frame. srx100 is out of the picture.
On 11/15/2010 01:45 PM, Phil Mayers wrote:
In the recent thread "MPLS in the Access", someone insightfully
pointed that the low-end SRX devices run JunOS with full MPLS support,
and are way, way cheaper than the various MPLS-CPE
In the recent thread "MPLS in the Access", someone insightfully pointed
that the low-end SRX devices run JunOS with full MPLS support, and are
way, way cheaper than the various MPLS-CPE switch-type devices that are
starting to appear.
This interests me: we have several sites on 100Mbit LES/WEE
16 matches
Mail list logo
