Onderwerp: Re: [j-nsp] Stable JunOS for MX80
Hi @thiyagarajan,
I don't know.
I think all MX are 2GB RAM, there are not requisites.
Just download junos and install.
Only what you need to know is what features you want to use on the box.
--
Eduardo Schoedler
2015-04-16 11:33 GMT-03:00
Thanks All for your suggestions,
Have taken 14.1R4 OS which has no bugs relating to our config. The memory
(2GB RAM and Flash) would suffice?
warm regards.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi wrote:
On (2015-04-16 12:39 +0530), thiyagarajan b wrote:
Hey,
Request to
11.4R12.4 seems pretty stable can also go 12.3R8.7 as well.
Tim Raphael
On 16/04/2015 3:09 pm, thiyagarajan b bn.thiyagara...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Request to suggest stable JunOS for MX 80 with 2GB DRAM and Flash.
Running internet service and MPLS majorly.
Thanks.
Hi All,
Request to suggest stable JunOS for MX 80 with 2GB DRAM and Flash.
Running internet service and MPLS majorly.
Thanks.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
On (2015-04-16 12:39 +0530), thiyagarajan b wrote:
Hey,
Request to suggest stable JunOS for MX 80 with 2GB DRAM and Flash.
Running internet service and MPLS majorly.
I don't believe software is like wine, which gets better as it ages. It's also
incredibly specific if some given release is
* thiyagarajan b bn.thiyagara...@gmail.com
Request to suggest stable JunOS for MX 80 with 2GB DRAM and Flash.
See http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=contentid=KB21476
Tore
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Le 16/04/15 10:58, thiyagarajan b a écrit :
Thanks All for your suggestions,
Have taken 14.1R4 OS which has no bugs relating to our config. The memory
(2GB RAM and Flash) would suffice?
The best release will depends of our need.
Basicly if you do not want sampling you are safe running
Hi Rapheal,
11.4 is what we are running now,where we encountered a bug forcing us to
upgrade. 12.3R8 have few memory related bugs which seems to be resolved in
14.1R4.
Warm Regards.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Raphael Mazelier r...@futomaki.net wrote:
Le 16/04/15 10:58, thiyagarajan b a
Hi Rob, The router was hitting the PR# 820988. The router interfaces got
down and came back.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Robert Hass robh...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you write something details regarding this bug which you encountering
on 11.4R ?
Rob
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:28 AM,
Can you write something details regarding this bug which you encountering
on 11.4R ?
Rob
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:28 AM, thiyagarajan b bn.thiyagara...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Rapheal,
11.4 is what we are running now,where we encountered a bug forcing us to
upgrade. 12.3R8 have few memory
Hi @thiyagarajan,
I don't know.
I think all MX are 2GB RAM, there are not requisites.
Just download junos and install.
Only what you need to know is what features you want to use on the box.
--
Eduardo Schoedler
2015-04-16 11:33 GMT-03:00 thiyagarajan b bn.thiyagara...@gmail.com:
@Eduardo.
If you are thinking in run flows, I strongly recommend 13.3R6.
With 12.3 I found too much bugs, including one who have killed my rpd and
take down all routing in the box.
--
Eduardo Schoedler
Em quinta-feira, 16 de abril de 2015, thiyagarajan b
bn.thiyagara...@gmail.com escreveu:
Hi All,
@Eduardo. What will be the memory requirement for it? Is there any matrix
for Junos with Memory Prerequisites?
Thanks.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Eduardo Schoedler lis...@esds.com.br
wrote:
If you are thinking in run flows, I strongly recommend 13.3R6.
With 12.3 I found too much bugs,
It's 10.4r3.4 or 10.4r4 which will be released in May.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Dale Shaw dale.shaw+j-...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
I know there have been some pretty ugly bugs on srx5k with multiple
SPCs in some early JUNOS 10.0 releases (and earlier). We're running
10.0R4 on a bunch
Dear Fellows,
Can anyone suggest a stable Junos from 10.x trail?
TIA
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
It's always a wise choice to go with Jtacs recommended version of junos for
your platform.
-Tim Eberhard
On Aug 31, 2010, at 2:11 AM, Salik Mobin softc...@yahoo.com wrote:
Dear Fellows,
Can anyone suggest a stable Junos from 10.x trail?
TIA
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:11:15AM -0700, Salik Mobin wrote:
Dear Fellows,
Can anyone suggest a stable Junos from 10.x trail?
You can't really make generalizations about JUNOS as a whole, it depends
on which platform you're talking about... That said, at this exact
moment we're actually
On Wednesday, September 01, 2010 12:06:26 am Richard A
Steenbergen wrote:
... but we're gonna be
forced into 10.2+ for MX to get full Trio support soon
anyways, so there isn't much benefit to hanging around
10.0 even if it was stable.
Same reason we're going to 10.2 - MX80 support as well
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Mark Tinka mti...@globaltransit.netwrote:
On Wednesday, September 01, 2010 12:06:26 am Richard A
Steenbergen wrote:
... but we're gonna be
forced into 10.2+ for MX to get full Trio support soon
anyways, so there isn't much benefit to hanging around
10.0
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 01:55:49AM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote:
I wish 10.5 were coming out tomorrow, but for now, 10.2R2.11 has been
behaving with the little we're doing. I'm tired of chasing JUNOS for
the past 2 years, so I wouldn't mind continuing with 10.2R2.11 until
10.5R4 or 10.6R4
On Wednesday, September 01, 2010 04:51:19 am Richard A
Steenbergen wrote:
It's like playing JUNOS Hero, you don't ever catch the
dragon. :)
Nope, you never do :-).
Personally I'd like them to support JUNOS images for a
bit longer. By the time a particular branch is actually
stable enough
21 matches
Mail list logo
