Re: [j-nsp] congestioning a logical sub-interface

2010-02-24 Thread meryem Z
hello , this is a geat thing for congestion simulation. is there any juniper document confirming this ? thank you. > Subject: RE: [j-nsp] congestioning a logical sub-interface > Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:24:50 +0530 > From: ragha...@juniper.net > To: merye...@hotm

Re: [j-nsp] congestioning a logical sub-interface

2010-02-23 Thread Raghavender P
ing a logical sub-interface Hello , Thanks for your response. But is this valid also for a logical sub-interface ? does this mean that the bandwidth percentage defined in a scheduler will be calculated based on the bandwidth defined in the shaping rate ? thank you. > Subject: Re

Re: [j-nsp] congestioning a logical sub-interface

2010-02-22 Thread meryem Z
Hello , Thanks for your response. But is this valid also for a logical sub-interface ? does this mean that the bandwidth percentage defined in a scheduler will be calculated based on the bandwidth defined in the shaping rate ? thank you. > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] congestioning a logical

Re: [j-nsp] congestioning a logical sub-interface

2010-02-22 Thread Truman Boyes
Scheduling on an interface with a shaping rate that is less than the physical line rate artificially creates congestion when an offered traffic load is greater than the shaping rate. ie. If you have a 5Mbps scheduler and you offer 5.01Mbps you will see queuing... On 22/02/2010, at 8:51 AM, me

[j-nsp] congestioning a logical sub-interface

2010-02-21 Thread meryem Z
Hello community, i need to verify Cos scheduler on my logical interface. to do this i need to simulate Congestion conditions. The question is : how to congestion a logical sub-interface without impacting the physical interface. is it possible to set a bandwidth limit for the sub-interface?