hello ,
this is a geat thing for congestion simulation. is there any juniper document
confirming this ?
thank you.
> Subject: RE: [j-nsp] congestioning a logical sub-interface
> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:24:50 +0530
> From: ragha...@juniper.net
> To: merye...@hotm
ing a logical sub-interface
Hello ,
Thanks for your response. But is this valid also for a logical
sub-interface ?
does this mean that the bandwidth percentage defined in a scheduler will
be calculated based on the bandwidth defined in the shaping rate ?
thank you.
> Subject: Re
Hello ,
Thanks for your response. But is this valid also for a logical sub-interface ?
does this mean that the bandwidth percentage defined in a scheduler will be
calculated based on the bandwidth defined in the shaping rate ?
thank you.
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] congestioning a logical
Scheduling on an interface with a shaping rate that is less than the physical
line rate artificially creates congestion when an offered traffic load is
greater than the shaping rate. ie. If you have a 5Mbps scheduler and you offer
5.01Mbps you will see queuing...
On 22/02/2010, at 8:51 AM, me
Hello community,
i need to verify Cos scheduler on my logical interface. to do this i need to
simulate Congestion conditions.
The question is : how to congestion a logical sub-interface without impacting
the physical interface. is it possible to set a bandwidth limit for the
sub-interface?
5 matches
Mail list logo