Re: [j-nsp] mc-lag standby peer not ageing out MAC addresses

2015-03-18 Thread Luca Salvatore
Yes it is enabled, under the vlan config. Although we have been told by ATAC that its not needed if using VRRP On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Maxwell Cole wrote: > Hi, > > Do you have mcae-mac-synchronize enabled in the bridge domain? (If you are > using them) > > > On 3/18/15 2:22 PM, Luca Sa

Re: [j-nsp] mc-lag standby peer not ageing out MAC addresses

2015-03-18 Thread Maxwell Cole
Hi, Do you have mcae-mac-synchronize enabled in the bridge domain? (If you are using them) On 3/18/15 2:22 PM, Luca Salvatore wrote: Hi, We have multi-chassis enabled for ae0 only, do you have any juniper document that mentions it is needed on all mc-lag links? We speak to ATAC quite a lo

Re: [j-nsp] mc-lag standby peer not ageing out MAC addresses

2015-03-18 Thread Syed Iftikhar Ahmed
Issue we faced was mac learning not mac aging. Multi-chassis protection is not mentioned in kb but it is required and configuring it solved the issue for us. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 18, 2015, at 10:28 PM, Luca Salvatore mailto:l...@digitalocean.com>> wrote: Hi, We have multi-chassis enabl

Re: [j-nsp] mc-lag standby peer not ageing out MAC addresses

2015-03-18 Thread Luca Salvatore
Hi, We have multi-chassis enabled for ae0 only, do you have any juniper document that mentions it is needed on all mc-lag links? We speak to ATAC quite a lot a this has never been mentioned to us. We use static ARPs on all IRBs where VRRP is running and also for the ICL link. I don't think the

Re: [j-nsp] mc-lag standby peer not ageing out MAC addresses

2015-03-18 Thread Syed Iftikhar Ahmed
Hi, I think iccp is up because you have a redundant path available using ae10 to reach iccp peer. I faced similar issue on a customer site and had to separate iccp link using l3 lag between chassis. Also please check if you have multi-chassis protection enabled, we enabled it on mc-lag interfa

Re: [j-nsp] mc-lag standby peer not ageing out MAC addresses

2015-03-18 Thread Luca Salvatore
here it all is. You'll just have to trust me that the ping works between peers using the ICCP IP. We use public addressing on these and I don't want to post the public IPs here. I've changed them to 10.1.1.1 and 10.1.1.2 in the output. I'm able to ping without issue. Some details ae0 is the iccp

Re: [j-nsp] mc-lag standby peer not ageing out MAC addresses

2015-03-18 Thread Syed Iftikhar Ahmed
Sh interface mc-ae id xx Iccp link configuration. Ping output between chassis using iccp ips And any one mc-lag interface config from both chassis Sent from my iPhone On Mar 18, 2015, at 7:50 PM, Luca Salvatore mailto:l...@digitalocean.com>> wrote: Hi, Yes VRRP is in use. Running 13.2R5.10, s

Re: [j-nsp] mc-lag standby peer not ageing out MAC addresses

2015-03-18 Thread Luca Salvatore
Hi, Yes VRRP is in use. Running 13.2R5.10, single RE. Running active-active What config do you want to see? I don't want to post the whole thing. On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Syed Iftikhar Ahmed wrote: > Is it active/ active or active/ standby setup. Config for 9200 is > different t

Re: [j-nsp] mc-lag standby peer not ageing out MAC addresses

2015-03-17 Thread Syed Iftikhar Ahmed
Is it active/ active or active/ standby setup. Config for 9200 is different than the One mentioned jn Kb, are you using vrrp as well? Please post your config, junos version. Do you have two RE in chassis or one? Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 18, 2015, at 12:39 AM, Luca Salvatore wrote: > > Hi

[j-nsp] mc-lag standby peer not ageing out MAC addresses

2015-03-17 Thread Luca Salvatore
Hi, Anyone seen an issue where the standby mc-lag peer does not age out MACs that it has learned from the active peer? i'm seeing a huge difference in the mac address count on two ex9208 mc-lag peers. By huge I mean about 75,000 difference. some basic testing shows that when a mac address is ag