: juniper-nsp
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] multiprotocol bgp and bgp reflection
--
Not so long ago you wrote :
BS> The configuration is the same like configuring normal route
BS> reflector except you must enable family inet-vpn for L3VPN. The
BS> important thing is you must have a LSP to all PE
--
Not so long ago you wrote :
BS> The configuration is the same like configuring normal route
BS> reflector except you must enable family inet-vpn for L3VPN. The
BS> important thing is you must have a LSP to all PEs because without
BS> LSP or reachability, the RR will mark the routes as unusable
Well, If P router is also RR for L3VPN, then they have just RR role. No
spetial configuration neede.
Please note that VPNv4 route table (bgp.l3vpn.0) is NOT used to create
forwarding state. So you can imaginne l3vpn RR abd orthogonal funcionality
to P-router label-switching. Just residing on same
Hi,
The configuration is the same like configuring normal route reflector except
you must enable family inet-vpn for L3VPN. The important thing is you must have
a LSP to all PEs because without LSP or reachability, the RR will mark the
routes as unusable and not advertised it to the PEs.
Cheer
Hi all:
Just read through the white paper "BGP Route
Reflection in Layer 3 VPN Networks". Usually MBGP is
activated on PE routers; ie. PE-to-PE and P routers
need no configuration of MBGP. But with the Router
Reflectors in the middle of PATHs of PE-to-PE, how
could this be implemented? Does anyone
5 matches
Mail list logo
