Re: [j-nsp] per-packet load balancing over multiple l2tp tunnels

Hi Arda thanks for your response - I suspected this might be the case. I'll give mlppp a go to see if that meets the requirement. And that's bad about the ospf interfaces! Regards, Dave Arda Balkanay wrote: I have a case about that issue (Case #2008-0703-0196 ) and Juniper said that: -roun

Re: [j-nsp] per-packet load balancing over multiple l2tp tunnels

I have a case about that issue (Case #2008-0703-0196 ) and Juniper said that: -round robin load sharing isn't supported for dynamic interfaces; alternate solution can be to use MLPPP for my case MLPPP is not possible because the incumbent who owns LAC does not permit it. Also for dynamic subscrib

[j-nsp] per-packet load balancing over multiple l2tp tunnels

Hi All Has anyone ever tried to do change the load balancing technique over l2tp tunnels on an ERX? the default is obviously per-flow: sh ip interface tun l2tp:139254/1105340/1016347 | i Multipath Multipath mode = hashed It seems enabling per-packet on the physical interface over which the l2