Dalibor Topic wrote:
Kiyo Inaba wrote:
D] Merge in the dropped cygwin patch
Still todo.
I've made some progress on this, in that I've made the current GNU
Classpath head build on Cygwin (patches mostly applied upstream).
Now I'm making kaffe build with that, before I investigate the
Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi Dalibor,
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 23:49 +0200, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Unfortuntely, there is one VM Interface change that (I assume) makes it
hard to support both 0.93 and 0.95 (VMTimezone), so I think we should
stay with 0.93 for the 1.1.8 release, and kick out a 1.1.9
Hi Dalibor,
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 23:49 +0200, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Unfortuntely, there is one VM Interface change that (I assume) makes it
hard to support both 0.93 and 0.95 (VMTimezone), so I think we should
stay with 0.93 for the 1.1.8 release, and kick out a 1.1.9 soon
afterwards.
Dalibor Topic wrote:
Dalibor Topic wrote:
This seems to work a bit better than I expected. I've just built
Classpath 0.95 separately, and then built Kaffe using it [1], and, other
than three failing regression tests (nothing really serious, just small
changes in expected test output), it
Dalibor Topic wrote:
Looking at a gcc checkout, I see that the m68k gcc has a builtin
define for coldfire, __mcoldfire__, couldn't we use that?
(The builtin_define is in gcc/gcc/config/m68k/m68k.h)
I've discussed that off-list with Roland (== tbfg on IRC), and according
to his tests, gcc
Dalibor Topic wrote:
Dalibor Topic wrote:
Dalibor Topic wrote:
D] Remove the merged in GNU Classpath and just use an existing
installation
I did the lower-half separation (separate build) but not yet
change the upper-half to point the location of classpath.
Ideas like
Dalibor Topic wrote:
Dalibor Topic wrote:
D] Remove the merged in GNU Classpath and just use an existing
installation
I did the lower-half separation (separate build) but not yet
change the upper-half to point the location of classpath.
Ideas like 'with-classpath-prefix',
Kiyo Inaba wrote:
Dalibor and others,
Dalibor wrote:
D) Merge in tbfg's m68k patch. Kiyo, could you take a look at it?
http://www.kaffe.org/pipermail/kaffe/2007-June/104949.html
Yes, I've spent some time to investigate this proposal.
In general, the patch posted tries to comment out some
Kiyo Inaba wrote:
So, from releasing point of view (based on Dalibor's and Riccardo's
wish list), we still have to
D] Either fix the serialization bugs leading to the two failing
regression tests, or mark them as XFAILs, and file bugs for it in GNU
Classpath's tracker, adding the failing tests
Dalibor Topic wrote:
D] Remove the merged in GNU Classpath and just use an existing
installation
I did the lower-half separation (separate build) but not yet
change the upper-half to point the location of classpath.
Ideas like 'with-classpath-prefix', 'with-classpath-libdir'
or
Dalibor and others,
Dalibor wrote:
D) Merge in tbfg's m68k patch. Kiyo, could you take a look at it?
http://www.kaffe.org/pipermail/kaffe/2007-June/104949.html
Yes, I've spent some time to investigate this proposal.
In general, the patch posted tries to comment out some instructions
which are
Hi everybody,
Hi Jim and everybody,
Thanks Jim to keep kaffe.org up and running.
So I'm assuming that the project isn't dead, it's just somewhat dormant.
It's been somewhat dead/dormant throughout much of it's history, but
it's still here, isn't it? :-)
Yes, it's still here! As I posted
Jim Pick wrote:
Hi everybody,
Hi Jim!
It's been a quiet month on the mailing list so far. That's partly my
fault, I think, since the mailing list was broken for some time.
Thank you for fixing it again.
It looks like the last CVS commit was 5 weeks ago.
I see Dalibor went to
Tim Bevan wrote:
Jim Pick wrote:
Dalibor has been doing a great job.
* Speaking of releases, we really should do another release sometime.
Yes please. I would like a stable version containing the fixes I needed.
Thanks!
Here is what needs to be done for 1.1.8:
* Either fix the
Jim Pick wrote:
Hi everybody,
* I imagine that in the future, people will most likely look to OpenJDK
as a starting point to add their enhancements. Is there still a role
for Kaffe to play here?
As a free open alternative probably.
It may be that it has had it's day and OpenJDK will take
Jim Pick wrote:
Hi everybody,
It's been a quiet month on the mailing list so far. That's partly my
fault, I think, since the mailing list was broken for some time.
It looks like the last CVS commit was 5 weeks ago.
I see Dalibor went to FOSDEM, and did some talking about Kaffe there.
So I'm
Hi everybody,
It's been a quiet month on the mailing list so far. That's partly my
fault, I think, since the mailing list was broken for some time.
It looks like the last CVS commit was 5 weeks ago.
I see Dalibor went to FOSDEM, and did some talking about Kaffe there.
So I'm assuming that the
17 matches
Mail list logo
