Re: [kaffe] JIT4

2004-07-07 Thread Dalibor Topic
Hi Mike, I wanted to ping you again about merging in jit 4 into kaffe.org CVS tree. Karl Trygve Kalleberg from gentoo-java project has volunteered to help out with the merge, so I wanted to see if we could get the merge done, and put your nice jit code to work in debian, gentoo and other distri

Re: [kaffe] JIT4

2004-03-03 Thread Dalibor Topic
Hi Mike, hi Tim, Timothy Stack wrote: Who should I hand it over to? I don't want the work to be lost, but wasn't sure anyone was actively maintaining kaffe. You can send it to me, Dalibor, or anyone else with CVS access. Either way, we'll just check it in as is. Although, we'll probably leave

Re: [kaffe] JIT4

2004-03-03 Thread Timothy Stack
> > Who should I hand it over to? I don't want the work to be lost, but > wasn't sure anyone was actively maintaining kaffe. You can send it to me, Dalibor, or anyone else with CVS access. Either way, we'll just check it in as is. Although, we'll probably leave it out of the distribution until

Re: [kaffe] JIT4

2004-03-03 Thread mikey
Who should I hand it over to? I don't want the work to be lost, but wasn't sure anyone was actively maintaining kaffe. mike > > > > "mike" == mikey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > mike> I have no problem handing it over, as long as the code has the > > mike> proper acknowledgemen

Re: [kaffe] JIT4

2004-03-01 Thread mikey
Probably depends on your needs in terms of performance. JIT3 would probably be easier to fix to get working, but it is definitely a lot slower, as shown in the paper. JIT4 is relatively stable, but definitely has more bugs, which are difficult to fix b/c you need to be able to debug a compiler.

Re: [kaffe] JIT4

2004-03-01 Thread mikey
Hey guys, Not sure what this about expect I'm being refereed to in the third person. :) I've been maintaining my version of the code here since Transvirtual went belly up. I still use it, but not for much longer. I have no problem handing it over, as long as the code has the pro

Re: [kaffe] JIT4

2004-03-01 Thread Timothy Stack
> > "mike" == mikey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > mike> I have no problem handing it over, as long as the code has the > mike> proper acknowledgements, but I will not be able to help with > mike> much support at the moment. Ooh, please post it, especially if you are going to stop w

Re: [kaffe] JIT4

2004-03-01 Thread Casey Marshall
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > "mike" == mikey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: mike> Probably depends on your needs in terms of performance. JIT3 mike> would probably be easier to fix to get working, but it is mike> definitely a lot slower, as shown in the paper. JIT4 is mike>

Re: [kaffe] JIT4

2004-03-01 Thread Casey Marshall
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > "mike" == mikey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: mike> Hey guys, Not sure what this about expect I'm being refereed to mike> in the third person. :) I've been maintaining my version of the mike> code here since Transvirtual went belly up. I still u

Re: [kaffe] JIT4

2004-03-01 Thread Dalibor Topic
Hi Casey, Casey Marshall wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi. Is there any documentation on `jit4' other than Michael Chen's paper? Nope. Except from asking michael himself. ;) I've CC:ed him on this mail. What would be involved in importing the PocketLinux jit4 into current

[kaffe] JIT4

2004-02-23 Thread Casey Marshall
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi. Is there any documentation on `jit4' other than Michael Chen's paper? What would be involved in importing the PocketLinux jit4 into current Kaffe? - -- Casey Marshall || [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/