Hi Mike,
I wanted to ping you again about merging in jit 4 into kaffe.org CVS
tree. Karl Trygve Kalleberg from gentoo-java project has volunteered to
help out with the merge, so I wanted to see if we could get the merge
done, and put your nice jit code to work in debian, gentoo and other
distri
Hi Mike, hi Tim,
Timothy Stack wrote:
Who should I hand it over to? I don't want the work to be lost, but
wasn't sure anyone was actively maintaining kaffe.
You can send it to me, Dalibor, or anyone else with CVS access. Either
way, we'll just check it in as is. Although, we'll probably leave
>
> Who should I hand it over to? I don't want the work to be lost, but
> wasn't sure anyone was actively maintaining kaffe.
You can send it to me, Dalibor, or anyone else with CVS access. Either
way, we'll just check it in as is. Although, we'll probably leave it out
of the distribution until
Who should I hand it over to? I don't want the work to be lost, but
wasn't sure anyone was actively maintaining kaffe.
mike
>
> > > "mike" == mikey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > mike> I have no problem handing it over, as long as the code has the
> > mike> proper acknowledgemen
Probably depends on your needs in terms of performance. JIT3 would
probably be easier to fix to get working, but it is definitely a lot
slower, as shown in the paper. JIT4 is relatively stable, but
definitely has more bugs, which are difficult to fix b/c you need to
be able to debug a compiler.
Hey guys,
Not sure what this about expect I'm being refereed to in the
third person. :) I've been maintaining my version of the code here
since Transvirtual went belly up. I still use it, but not for much
longer.
I have no problem handing it over, as long as the code has the
pro
> > "mike" == mikey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> mike> I have no problem handing it over, as long as the code has the
> mike> proper acknowledgements, but I will not be able to help with
> mike> much support at the moment.
Ooh, please post it, especially if you are going to stop w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "mike" == mikey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
mike> Probably depends on your needs in terms of performance. JIT3
mike> would probably be easier to fix to get working, but it is
mike> definitely a lot slower, as shown in the paper. JIT4 is
mike>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "mike" == mikey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
mike> Hey guys, Not sure what this about expect I'm being refereed to
mike> in the third person. :) I've been maintaining my version of the
mike> code here since Transvirtual went belly up. I still u
Hi Casey,
Casey Marshall wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
Is there any documentation on `jit4' other than Michael Chen's paper?
Nope. Except from asking michael himself. ;) I've CC:ed him on this mail.
What would be involved in importing the PocketLinux jit4 into current
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
Is there any documentation on `jit4' other than Michael Chen's paper?
What would be involved in importing the PocketLinux jit4 into current
Kaffe?
- --
Casey Marshall || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/
11 matches
Mail list logo