Re: Would a source only 0.7.0 release be better?

2011-12-05 Thread pyr
If you go this way, you're still left with two issues if you want adoption to be smooth: * KAFKA-133 which makes integrating clients hard otherwise * Maybe building recipes for creating standard packages (rpm + deb) Most people will install and configure kafka from a CM system (puppet, chef or

Re: Would a source only 0.7.0 release be better?

2011-12-04 Thread Neha Narkhede
Chris, Thanks for stepping up to help here. Based on feedback from various members on general@, I think it is wiser to do the source release, with the README having a How to build and download dependencies section. We still have to go through all the jars we package in our source release, and

Re: Would a source only 0.7.0 release be better?

2011-12-03 Thread Chris Burroughs
On 12/03/2011 02:40 PM, Chris Burroughs wrote: My reading is that since we would only be distributing source code, the NOTICE file should not reflect binary dependencies and would have *only* the standard Apache bit [3]. Same for LICENSE. I suppose any jar's checked into svn would complicate