I've been compiling kernels for many years, even before RH6... Did RH
6.. 7.2 ... 7.3 .. now 9.
Why is RH9 so much slower than any other ?? About 60% slower, thats
a LOT ! These
were compiled all on the same machine. RH7.3 was the fastest.
Just curious.
Frank
[EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.4
On Saturday 02 February 2002 20:17, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
> Eric Raymond commented about the patch I submitted to xconfig, so I'd like
> to explain myself.
>
> I didn't fix xconfig; Olaf Dietsche did. I tested the patch and sent it
> to Linus in accordance with my duties as maintainer
Eric Raymond commented about the patch I submitted to xconfig, so I'd like to
explain myself.
I didn't fix xconfig; Olaf Dietsche did. I tested the patch and sent it
to Linus in accordance with my duties as maintainer. After a week or two,
I'll send it again, mark it "try #2", and send copies t
Xconfig is failing for kernel>=2.4.11. The breakage appears to be in the
network code
> make xconfig
rm -f include/asm
( cd include ; ln -sf asm-i386 asm)
make -C scripts kconfig.tk
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.12-ac3-tux2-A9/scripts'
cat header.tk >> ./kconfig.tk
./tkparse < .
