https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345307
--- Comment #29 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
Can anyone take a look on this?
Thank you in advance!
Aleksandar
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375514
Bug ID: 375514
Summary: valgrind_get_tls_addr() does not work in case of
static TLS
Product: valgrind
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
St
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370028
--- Comment #13 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
(In reply to Julian Seward from comment #9)
> This feels to me like hiding misalignment problems. I'd prefer to remove
> misaligned
> accesses where possible. Building with --enable-usban at
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375514
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #103619|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370028
--- Comment #14 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
Ivo, Julian,
Can we do something about this? It would be nice if we could define the
strategy and start to eliminate false warnings. Please take a look on Patch
1/4, if proposed concept is acceptable to you
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370028
--- Comment #16 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
Thank You for review.
I agree with changes in comment and also You are right about name.
I vote for ASSUME_ALIGNED, in that case, it is clear that there is a
assumption.
(In reply to Ivo Raisr from comment
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370028
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #101429|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370028
--- Comment #19 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
(In reply to Ivo Raisr from comment #17)
> I was also wondering of the impact on other architectures.
> Please could you conduct a quick test to see how the compiler resolves
> ASSUME_ALIGNED on amd64
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370028
--- Comment #25 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
(In reply to Julian Seward from comment #23)
> What's the status of this now? Can it be closed?
No, it shouldn't. This is just the beginning. I'll prepare next few patches
soon.
Also, there
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370028
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aleksandar.rik...@imgtec.co
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370028
--- Comment #32 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
(In reply to Ivo Raisr from comment #31)
> Another patch committed in SVN r16348.
Thank You! Please take a look at Tamara's patch for mc_main.c.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watc
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370028
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #101431|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345307
--- Comment #30 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
Patch from #373069 has been committed.
Now we need just https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=102559 to make
memcheck/leak_cpp_interior pass with gcc-6.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370028
--- Comment #11 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
> Can we simplify the patch #4 just to
> # define DO(n) (*fpu)[n] = arch->vex.guest_f##n
> ?
> Would that work? (Check the attached patch.)
Hi Petar,
It wouldn't work - (*fpu)[n] a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373069
Bug ID: 373069
Summary: memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior fails with GCC 5.1+
Product: valgrind
Version: unspecified
Platform: unspecified
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373069
--- Comment #2 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
Created attachment 102518
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=102518&action=edit
Turn off CXX11_ABI
This patch forces leak_cpp_interior to be compiled using old implementation of
std::string.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373069
--- Comment #3 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
(In reply to Ivo Raisr from comment #1)
> I cannot comment anything about std::string implementation.
> However for your second query have a look at bug:
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345307
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373069
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mips3...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345307
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aleksandar.rik...@imgtec.co
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396905
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aleksandar.rik...@rt-rk.com
--- Comment #2
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345763
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aleksandar.rik...@rt-rk.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345763
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #92187|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345763
--- Comment #33 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
Created attachment 111846
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=111846&action=edit
Fix tests
With the last three changes, there are no failing tests on mips N32.
--
You are receiving th
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345763
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #111845|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345763
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #111846|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345763
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #112103|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345763
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #112104|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382563
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aleksandar.rik...@imgtec.co
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382563
--- Comment #13 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
Created attachment 108541
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=108541&action=edit
MIPS MSA 2/5 - Full support of MIPS SIMD Architecture Module (MSA) instruction
set for VEX
--
You are receivi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382563
--- Comment #14 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
Created attachment 108542
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=108542&action=edit
MIPS MSA 3/5 - Detecting presence of MSA capabilities
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watch
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382563
--- Comment #15 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
Created attachment 108543
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=108543&action=edit
MIPS MSA 4/5 - Adds support for guest V128 registers on MIPS in Memcheck
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382563
--- Comment #16 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
Created attachment 108545
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=108545&action=edit
MIPS MSA 5/5 - MSA regression tests
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382563
--- Comment #17 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
Hi Petar,
Slightly reorganized, refactored and re-based patches are ready.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382563
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #108545|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345307
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #102559|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415516
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aleksandar.rik...@rt-rk.com
--- Comment #3
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417238
--- Comment #3 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
In fact, in most cases of the Ity_I1 operations, the u32 field is used (e.g.,
vbits.c: 51). The u1 field is used only in few places (removed by the patch).
That isn't a problem on LE since unit8_t overlaps
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417238
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aleksandar.rik...@rt-rk.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400593
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #116054|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400872
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #116206|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400872
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #116207|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400872
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #116209|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400872
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #116208|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400872
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #116204|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400872
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #116211|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400872
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #122259|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400872
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #122262|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400872
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #122263|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400872
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #122264|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400162
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aleksandar.rik...@rt-rk.com
--- Comment #3
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400162
--- Comment #4 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
Created attachment 124625
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=124625&action=edit
Fix none/tests/pth_atfork1 musl compilation error
Tested on nanoMIPS/musl/linux and x86/glibc.
--
You are re
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400162
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mips3...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400593
Bug ID: 400593
Summary: Statx
Product: valgrind
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
Severity: normal
Priority: NOR
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400593
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Statx |Statx in Coregrind
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400593
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mips3...@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400872
Bug ID: 400872
Summary: Add nanoMIPS support to Valgrind
Product: valgrind
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
Severity: normal
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400872
--- Comment #2 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
Created attachment 116207
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=116207&action=edit
Add nanoMIPS support to Valgrind 2/4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400872
--- Comment #1 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
Created attachment 116206
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=116206&action=edit
Add nanoMIPS support to Valgrind 1/4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400872
--- Comment #3 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
Created attachment 116208
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=116208&action=edit
Add nanoMIPS support to Valgrind 3/4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400872
--- Comment #4 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
Created attachment 116209
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=116209&action=edit
Add nanoMIPS support to Valgrind 4/4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400872
--- Comment #5 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
Created attachment 116210
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=116210&action=edit
Fix some tests so they can be compiled for nanoMIPS
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400872
--- Comment #6 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
Created attachment 116211
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=116211&action=edit
Add tests for nanoMIPS instruction set
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400872
--- Comment #7 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
Here are few patches which implement nanoMIPS support:
* Mips specific code refactor - there is no functional impact but it is
necessary in order apply other patches.
* nanoMIPS support to Valgrind */4 - Add
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400872
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mips3...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345763
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aleksandar.rik...@rt-rk.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345763
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #92187|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345763
--- Comment #33 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
Created attachment 111846
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=111846&action=edit
Fix tests
With the last three changes, there are no failing tests on mips N32.
--
You are receiving th
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345763
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #111845|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345763
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #111846|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345763
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #112103|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345763
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #112104|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396905
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aleksandar.rik...@rt-rk.com
--- Comment #2
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382563
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aleksandar.rik...@imgtec.co
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382563
--- Comment #13 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
Created attachment 108541
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=108541&action=edit
MIPS MSA 2/5 - Full support of MIPS SIMD Architecture Module (MSA) instruction
set for VEX
--
You are receivi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382563
--- Comment #14 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
Created attachment 108542
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=108542&action=edit
MIPS MSA 3/5 - Detecting presence of MSA capabilities
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watch
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382563
--- Comment #15 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
Created attachment 108543
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=108543&action=edit
MIPS MSA 4/5 - Adds support for guest V128 registers on MIPS in Memcheck
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382563
--- Comment #16 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
Created attachment 108545
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=108545&action=edit
MIPS MSA 5/5 - MSA regression tests
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382563
--- Comment #17 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
Hi Petar,
Slightly reorganized, refactored and re-based patches are ready.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382563
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #108545|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370028
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aleksandar.rik...@imgtec.co
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370028
--- Comment #32 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
(In reply to Ivo Raisr from comment #31)
> Another patch committed in SVN r16348.
Thank You! Please take a look at Tamara's patch for mc_main.c.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watc
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370028
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #101431|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345307
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #102559|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370028
--- Comment #14 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
Ivo, Julian,
Can we do something about this? It would be nice if we could define the
strategy and start to eliminate false warnings. Please take a look on Patch
1/4, if proposed concept is acceptable to you
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370028
--- Comment #16 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
Thank You for review.
I agree with changes in comment and also You are right about name.
I vote for ASSUME_ALIGNED, in that case, it is clear that there is a
assumption.
(In reply to Ivo Raisr from comment
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370028
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #101429|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370028
--- Comment #19 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
(In reply to Ivo Raisr from comment #17)
> I was also wondering of the impact on other architectures.
> Please could you conduct a quick test to see how the compiler resolves
> ASSUME_ALIGNED on amd64
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370028
--- Comment #25 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
(In reply to Julian Seward from comment #23)
> What's the status of this now? Can it be closed?
No, it shouldn't. This is just the beginning. I'll prepare next few patches
soon.
Also, there
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345307
--- Comment #29 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
Can anyone take a look on this?
Thank you in advance!
Aleksandar
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375514
Bug ID: 375514
Summary: valgrind_get_tls_addr() does not work in case of
static TLS
Product: valgrind
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
St
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370028
--- Comment #13 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
(In reply to Julian Seward from comment #9)
> This feels to me like hiding misalignment problems. I'd prefer to remove
> misaligned
> accesses where possible. Building with --enable-usban at
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375514
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #103619|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345307
--- Comment #30 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
Patch from #373069 has been committed.
Now we need just https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=102559 to make
memcheck/leak_cpp_interior pass with gcc-6.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370028
--- Comment #11 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
> Can we simplify the patch #4 just to
> # define DO(n) (*fpu)[n] = arch->vex.guest_f##n
> ?
> Would that work? (Check the attached patch.)
Hi Petar,
It wouldn't work - (*fpu)[n] a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373069
Bug ID: 373069
Summary: memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior fails with GCC 5.1+
Product: valgrind
Version: unspecified
Platform: unspecified
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373069
--- Comment #2 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
Created attachment 102518
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=102518&action=edit
Turn off CXX11_ABI
This patch forces leak_cpp_interior to be compiled using old implementation of
std::string.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373069
--- Comment #3 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
(In reply to Ivo Raisr from comment #1)
> I cannot comment anything about std::string implementation.
> However for your second query have a look at bug:
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345307
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373069
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mips3...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345307
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aleksandar.rik...@imgtec.co
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303877
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aleksandar.rik...@imgtec.co
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
