https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417238
Petar Jovanovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417238
--- Comment #5 from Julian Seward ---
> Julian, what do you think? Can we move this forward?
Yeah, the patch looks reasonable to me. Pls do land. Thank you all
for the analysis and the fix.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417238
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Arnez ---
(In reply to Aleksandar Rikalo from comment #3)
[...]
> The other possible way to fix [...] seems like it would be more
> complicated, especially because valgrind_[set|get]_vbits() functions (see
> valgrind.c) have
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417238
--- Comment #3 from Aleksandar Rikalo ---
In fact, in most cases of the Ity_I1 operations, the u32 field is used (e.g.,
vbits.c: 51). The u1 field is used only in few places (removed by the patch).
That isn't a problem on LE since unit8_t overlaps with
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417238
Andreas Arnez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ar...@linux.ibm.com
--- Comment #2 from Andreas
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417238
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.kde.org/show_b
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417238
Carl Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@us.ibm.com
--- Comment #1 from Carl Love ---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417238
Aleksandar Rikalo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aleksandar.rik...@rt-rk.com
